From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_maintain and USAGE privilege on schema
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 21:17:44 -0500
Message-ID: <ZotMSNgUFNYcgxi8@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56596b81-088f-4c0c-9a88-b5f27a7a62e9@oss.nttdata.com>
References: <56596b81-088f-4c0c-9a88-b5f27a7a62e9@oss.nttdata.com>
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 01:03:42AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> If this has already been discussed and the current behavior is deemed proper,
> I'm sorry for bringing it up again. Even in that case, it would be helpful
> to document that USAGE privilege on the schema may be necessary in addition
> to pg_maintain to perform the maintenance command.
If we don't proceed with the implicit-USAGE-privilege idea, +1 for
documenting.
--
nathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_maintain and USAGE privilege on schema
In-Reply-To: <ZotMSNgUFNYcgxi8@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox