public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Christoph Berg <[email protected]>
To: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <[email protected]>
Cc: Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
Cc: Wolfgang Walther <[email protected]>
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:44:15 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOYmi+=xbQcMErUVfUv-RHhRZTbJij9SiRpVG8Y4MiB4BUC8nw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+=WA4ZfyHWt+4=yFV7VAXQWvNKsn4R=3PwLd4GfmSTiBA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+=cs+gDTAH0L+3JzpRLeHPOXDQxu7MOfsbjah9SkAP_kw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOYmi+=UsSnLM4K+hYkhrezpQROQ5jr=72feAkQ0Te8GJf3Fbg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+mXoq9dUagnkXDgWa72QjCg8SdagBz_yGPUdh1Px0XD5g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOYmi+m5L=-S8QuZgLcSdHyXreVDCVr2NBbCZVcdVzE8B2y5Xg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGECzQTojfE6iOFT2c1Yp+1ezQYKBT1jGXmXa2W_M8pQGc1_5w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOYmi+=xbQcMErUVfUv-RHhRZTbJij9SiRpVG8Y4MiB4BUC8nw@mail.gmail.com>
Re: Jacob Champion
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 2:39 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 01:20, Jacob Champion
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > So, as we approach Beta 3: can anyone think of a way that this plan will fail?
> >
> > It's not entirely clear what plan exactly you talk about here. Are you
> > saying you want to remove the -MAJOR suffix now for PG18? Or you want
> > to postpone doing that until PG19, when you would have designed a
> > stable API?
>
> That is a PG19 plan. I don't want to make any changes for 18 unless
> someone can see a fatal flaw; this is just my mid-beta check.
FTR, fine with me.
> > If your goal is to remove this
> > during-upgrade breakage after PG19, then I'd say that seems totally
> > fine for a new feature.
>
> That's the hope, yes.
Well, at the PG19 release time it will no longer be new. But the plan
sounds like a good one.
Christoph
view thread (31+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: libpq-oauth: a mid-beta naming check
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox