From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: anonymous unions (C11)
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 10:16:11 -0500
Message-ID: <aN_ou5ur9ONq2wGI@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16654b42-d65f-4f1f-9094-33422444a327@eisentraut.org>
References: <f00a9968-388e-4f8c-b5ef-5102e962d997@eisentraut.org>
<aNKsDg0fJwqhZdXX@nathan>
<16654b42-d65f-4f1f-9094-33422444a327@eisentraut.org>
On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 09:01:26AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 23.09.25 16:17, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> I would have used this in the DSM registry if it was available. Patch
>> attached.
>
> This looks good to me, and also mostly harmless in terms of backpatching.
Committed, thanks for reviewing.
--
nathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, peter@eisentraut.org
Subject: Re: anonymous unions (C11)
In-Reply-To: <aN_ou5ur9ONq2wGI@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox