agora inbox for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, david@justatheory.com, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Subject: Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:06:16 -0500
Message-ID: <aPKFmL8VjOKNVLcw@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1713509.1760721320@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <aPJ03E2itovDBcKX@nathan>
	<1713509.1760721320@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 01:15:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, I favor the approach of having an in-tree, per-branch file
> containing the commit hash of a commit that is the current ABI
> reference for that branch.  If the file doesn't exist (which it
> wouldn't in master, and probably not in recently-forked branches),
> skip ABI checking.  I think this is superior to the discussed
> alternative of depending on git tags, because files are easy to
> change or remove, while tags are not.  In particular, I think it'd
> likely be impossible to make the ABI reference point go backwards
> if we use tags.  Maybe that's not a case we'd ever need, but I'm
> unconvinced of that.

I'm new to the topic, but IMHO the per-branch file approach is by far the
best approach.  Not only is it much more flexible, but we could even use it
as a centralized list of ABI breaks for a given branch with justification
for each.  I can't think of any strong advantages of keeping this stuff in
git metadata.  git itself uses a file for blame.ignoreRevsFile...

-- 
nathan





view thread (70+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <aPKFmL8VjOKNVLcw@nathan>
Permalink:  ../aPKFmL8VjOKNVLcw@nathan/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/aPKFmL8VjOKNVLcw@nathan

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andrew@dunslane.net
  Subject: Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()
  In-Reply-To: <aPKFmL8VjOKNVLcw@nathan>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox