From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support reading large objects with pg_read_all_data
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 09:44:50 -0600
Message-ID: <aYS68rra7T4r8w2M@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH5HC96dxAEvP78s1-JK_nDABH5c4w2MDfyx4vEWxBEfofGWsw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH5HC96dxAEvP78s1-JK_nDABH5c4w2MDfyx4vEWxBEfofGWsw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 03:26:02PM +0530, Nitin Motiani wrote:
> Please take a look and let me know what you folks think. If this
> approach makes sense, I will update the corresponding docs in the
> patch.
At a glance, it looks generally reasonable to me. In addition to updating
the documentation, I'd recommend adding tests.
--
nathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, nitinmotiani@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support reading large objects with pg_read_all_data
In-Reply-To: <aYS68rra7T4r8w2M@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox