public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
To: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: relfilenode statistics
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 03:57:48 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<ezbfcpjtfh3vtm667aegyrptcdsvinbuxw6y5p6j3e5fbffrl5@i7v6cjapz3yv>
	<[email protected]>
	<zferux2jlbhqymubzhpubfrkjzhzxzguq4eprtycojtif5vbqh@2t7cu2teyqmi>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 07:43:43AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 06:39:03AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 09:29:02AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:39:15AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > > On 2025-12-16 16:33:17 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > 
> > > Andres, Michael, let me try to sum up my understanding of the current state
> > > and see how we could now move forward. 
> > > 
> > > First of all, I understand that you both think that the patch outcome will be
> > > useful to have. The current debate is about the design, the current status is:
> > > 
> > > - Andres raised specific technical/implementation concerns and I've proposed
> > > solutions in [1]. It also looks like Andres supports the overall design approach. 
> > > - Michael is not really ok with the current design approach.
> > > 
> > > That means, that with the current design in place, Michael would probably not
> > > commit it (even after review(s)).
> > > 
> > > Given that I'm also in favor of the current proposed design, this raises the
> > > questions:
> > > 
> > > - Andres, would you commit such a patch (after review iteration(s) of course)?
> > > - Michael, if Andres is ok with the above, would you still offer your help for the
> > > review part (even if the design is not what you "prefer"/"like")?
> > > 
> > > [1]: https://postgr.es/m/aUEyzoOJtrCLAEeT%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
> > 
> > PFA, tiny rebase due to 9842e8aca09.
> 
> PFA, a new mandatory rebase.

PFA, new rebase due to fba4233c832.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: relfilenode statistics
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox