From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: remove bits* types
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:21:41 -0500
Message-ID: <acV5NYm4XBzIE50N@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3b5edc3-c0f5-42ae-b463-17018ee03dcb@eisentraut.org>
References: <absbX33E4eaA0Ity@nathan>
<a3b5edc3-c0f5-42ae-b463-17018ee03dcb@eisentraut.org>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 05:27:34PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I'm mildly in favor of removing them. But it appears there is no consensus.
Same here. While it still doesn't look like anybody is totally opposed to
the idea, you are right that there is no consensus.
--
nathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, peter@eisentraut.org, andres@anarazel.de, alvherre@kurilemu.de, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: remove bits* types
In-Reply-To: <acV5NYm4XBzIE50N@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox