pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:13:51 -0400
Message-ID: <aeD8ryt2uX8flDP8@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416075457.GA25798@p46.dedyn.io;lightning.p46.dedyn.io>
References: <ad7ngXC125AvNqC2@momjian.us>
	<CAExHW5vjpd=mWauQZsTbKX9QqD8yxDUABBGQAT5n+CT+nr8QHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<ad_DcdMpMOxb1MGK@momjian.us>
	<CAOYmi+nXOFxSjh__wwr0pOaRyGjr2gYwqcQ=vkh=KxQfAcBqdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<ad_mirRyoIDFYSzC@momjian.us>
	<20260416075457.GA25798@p46.dedyn.io;lightning.p46.dedyn.io>

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 09:54:57AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Well, I am guessing you didn't read this thread fully:
> > 
> > 	https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/adElLtegJxi6Yecv%40momjian.us
> >
> > This was specifically for "Co-authored-by:" == committer, but the text
> > was not clear enough.  However, that doesn't match your usage where a
> > missing "Author" is considered to be the committer.
> 
> I think if the committer omits an "Author" tag, but credits a
> non-committer as "Co-Author", then both the committer and the
> non-committer should be considered authors and credited in the release
> notes.
> 
> What would be the use-case for a sole non-committer "Co-Author" (as
> opposed to just crediting the non-committer as "Author") otherwise be?

I agree with you, and made that case in January of 2025 and in the email
thread URL above.  However, I seemed to annoy people more than help
them, so I am not going to revisit it.  If someone else wants to restart
that thread and get a different consensus, feel free to do so.

My guess is that most (vocal?) committers prefer to have Author and
Co-Author indicate different levels of authorship in the commit text,
rather than have them have different behavior for release note
authorship.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.





view thread (133+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <aeD8ryt2uX8flDP8@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../aeD8ryt2uX8flDP8@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/aeD8ryt2uX8flDP8@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, mbanck@gmx.net, jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com, ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com, hlinnaka@iki.fi, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
  In-Reply-To: <aeD8ryt2uX8flDP8@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox