public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
To: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <[email protected]>
Cc: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: future of PQfn()
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 09:57:47 -0500
Message-ID: <aiGSa7XpUTRFt-be@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <ahX6nb1aqh51IhHC@nathan>
<CAOYmi+n6eFXs_pncObs9Vhe7S1gbvepRncYJaaO98anxL8WODg@mail.gmail.com>
<ahmtVYcf4EYwz02U@nathan>
<CAOYmi+mA4Cdb+RWV2M83FbsSN85t2iuoXejA-PKNrQ_ayHOQWw@mail.gmail.com>
<ahm6kuL3L3wSYo6d@nathan>
<CAOYmi+nhtqGZAgtLvR2OdNZ8mfdY79qseEtKXnbs1jvtLNOrZA@mail.gmail.com>
<ahnB8zuR0AYegcJI@nathan>
<CAOYmi+=sO6dR6P2c48f6ZT9aOgzVdf+pjn3TMsehTPr8-Yxjsw@mail.gmail.com>
<aiCeYhW4Ksu-BFqC@nathan>
<[email protected]>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 11:39:02AM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> - <sect1 id="libpq-fastpath">
>> - <title>The Fast-Path Interface</title>
>> -
>> - <indexterm zone="libpq-fastpath">
>> - <primary>fast path</primary>
>> - </indexterm>
>
> Should we move this to the "Obsolete or Renamed Features" appendix
> (e.g. appendix-obsolete-libpq-fastpath.sgml) with a description of why
> it was removed?
Yes, I think we should. Done in the attached.
--
nathan
view thread (18+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: future of PQfn()
In-Reply-To: <aiGSa7XpUTRFt-be@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox