From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Hans Buschmann <buschmann@nidsa.net>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: AW: PG19beta1: GCC 16.1.1 warning: ‘actual_arg_types’ may be used uninitialized in clauses.c
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 11:05:03 -0500
Message-ID: <ajQXL6rEkHottp3q@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96c30bf5d14b41bfbf6ed503d6114708@nidsa.net>
References: <aiGUxEzo4o5_fRIq@nathan>
<aiwb1wzWn-q1LNti@alvherre.pgsql>
<ajKxliOE7JzBPQiR@nathan>
<dd1352c0-baf6-1a5b-8342-570ef9126777@xs4all.nl>
<96c30bf5d14b41bfbf6ed503d6114708@nidsa.net>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 11:33:23AM +0000, Hans Buschmann wrote:
> I also can confirm that this silences the compiler warning of GCC 16.1.1.
Thanks! I'm debating whether to back-patch this to unsupported branches.
IIUC it qualifies. I'm getting ready to bump up the minimum supported
version of pg_dump and friends to v10, so maybe I should stop there. But
also, stopping at v14 might be good enough for something small like this.
Any opinions?
--
nathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, buschmann@nidsa.net, er@xs4all.nl, alvherre@kurilemu.de
Subject: Re: AW: PG19beta1: GCC 16.1.1 warning: ‘actual_arg_types’ may be used uninitialized in clauses.c
In-Reply-To: <ajQXL6rEkHottp3q@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox