pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>
To: Takashi Menjo <takashi.menjo@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Deng, Gang <gang.deng@intel.com>
Cc: Takashi Menjo <takashi.menjou.vg@hco.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Subject: Re: Map WAL segment files on PMEM as WAL buffers
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 13:40:51 -0700
Message-ID: <bdf08089-eb79-e96d-b8ce-4779000bba5a@timescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOwnP3M2rN+EedxizecGvtsT4Zp0jVeQ3x6GVSKnyEJKxdUe+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOwnP3N6Zi2nQ0WzuXA69w2mhZ5R5uvVJUDNH92CTA09MErh9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20220106040000.GU14051@telsasoft.com>
	<CA+hUKGL4CjH5+ZJGwgZapj0ZSPbptCz=kHPDEu-N+JJMRANZtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20220106051908.GV14051@telsasoft.com>
	<CAOwnP3PSDxKhBUGS=97_b44s65DxaGexJB2-Nbmf7SGiLUJ2pg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20220107044337.GB14051@telsasoft.com>
	<20220117073444.GZ14051@telsasoft.com>
	<CAOwnP3MKmca24HVVkmw0KL6KR8cXLk14C=-UE3YejbjS08b6qQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOwnP3PvE1VtwuezUoLtnKMnL=zJWutybFdtSHCgVbD7hhrhAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOwnP3PT3KX6LaDoLFAz642WvgPFx9UAzqJASkreR60iH-AtVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20220322004439.5pfgu434y3lp7t7t@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<CAOwnP3M2rN+EedxizecGvtsT4Zp0jVeQ3x6GVSKnyEJKxdUe+A@mail.gmail.com>

As discussed in [1], we're taking this opportunity to return some
patchsets that don't appear to be getting enough reviewer interest.

This is not a rejection, since we don't necessarily think there's
anything unacceptable about the entry, but it differs from a standard
"Returned with Feedback" in that there's probably not much actionable
feedback at all. Rather than code changes, what this patch needs is more
community interest. You might

- ask people for help with your approach,
- see if there are similar patches that your code could supplement,
- get interested parties to agree to review your patch in a CF, or
- possibly present the functionality in a way that's easier to review
  overall.

(Doing these things is no guarantee that there will be interest, but
it's hopefully better than endlessly rebasing a patchset that is not
receiving any feedback from the community.)

Once you think you've built up some community support and the patchset
is ready for review, you (or any interested party) can resurrect the
patch entry by visiting

    https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3181/

and changing the status to "Needs Review", and then changing the
status again to "Move to next CF". (Don't forget the second step;
hopefully we will have streamlined this in the near future!)

Thanks,
--Jacob

[1] https://postgr.es/m/86140760-8ba5-6f3a-3e6e-5ca6c060bd24@timescale.com







view thread (22+ messages)

Message-ID: <bdf08089-eb79-e96d-b8ce-4779000bba5a@timescale.com>
Permalink:  ../bdf08089-eb79-e96d-b8ce-4779000bba5a@timescale.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/bdf08089-eb79-e96d-b8ce-4779000bba5a@timescale.com

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: jchampion@timescale.com, takashi.menjo@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de, pryzby@telsasoft.com, thomas.munro@gmail.com, tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com, sawada.mshk@gmail.com, hlinnaka@iki.fi, tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com, gang.deng@intel.com, takashi.menjou.vg@hco.ntt.co.jp, boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com, daniel@yesql.se
  Subject: Re: Map WAL segment files on PMEM as WAL buffers
  In-Reply-To: <bdf08089-eb79-e96d-b8ce-4779000bba5a@timescale.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox