public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
To: Tristan Partin <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: meson: pgxs Makefile.global differences
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 11:33:45 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CUV2U1MR5T8E.2T55FGZG23INJ@gonk>
	<[email protected]>


On 2023-08-17 Th 16:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-08-17 14:45:54 -0500, Tristan Partin wrote:
>> On Thu Aug 17, 2023 at 2:32 PM CDT, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> I started digging into a warning I noticed on my FDW builds where
>>> Postgres is built with meson, e.g.<https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2023-08-16%2018%3A37%3A25...;
>>> which has this:
>>>
>>> cc1: warning: ‘-Wformat-security’ ignored without ‘-Wformat’
>>> [-Wformat-security]
>>>
>>> I found that the pgxs Makefile.global built under meson is a bit
>>> different. On debug builds for both this is what I get on HEAD (meson)
>>> and REL_15_STABLE (autoconf), stripped of the current components:
> I assume "current" means the flags that are present in both cases?
>
>
>>>            HEAD: CFLAGS =-Wshadow=compatible-local
>>> REL_15_STABLE: CFLAGS =-Wall  -g
>>>
>>> The warning is apparently due to the missing -Wall.
>>>
>>> Shouldn't we be aiming for pretty much identical settings?
> The difference for -Wshadow=compatible-local is due to changes between 15 and
> HEAD.
>
> We're indeed not adding -Wall right now (the warning level is handled by
> meson, so it doesn't show up in our cflags right now).
>
>
>> I agree that they should be identical. The meson bild should definitely be
>> aiming for 100% compatibility for the Makefile.global.
> I don't think that's feasible. It was a fair bit of work to get the most
> important contents to match, while skipping lots of things that are primarily
> relevant for building the server (which isn't relevant for pgxs).
>
> That said, in this specific case, I agree, we should likely emit -Wall to
> Makefile.global in meson as well.
>

Where should we do that? And how about the -g that's also missing for 
debug-enabled builds?


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com


view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: meson: pgxs Makefile.global differences
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox