pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:32:58 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <c8d94212-72cc-cd9f-162f-8eb845ba104f@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEioDuePEBRnfJYk@nathan>
References: <2edb7a57-b225-3b23-a680-62ba90658fec@gmx.net>
	<a7344d8f-927c-1f97-6cc0-ac630deb98c4@gmx.net>
	<c0e531f9-accc-3a93-e9e6-2cec1471f9e9@gmx.net>
	<1282067.1744651649@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<c6bb93c1-4042-743c-096c-27c5e7c73347@gmx.net>
	<f7a23708-c336-c189-f155-4b3197bf6ea0@gmx.net>
	<aEioDuePEBRnfJYk@nathan>

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> I also wrote a couple of test programs to show the difference between
> fseeko-ing and fread-ing through a file with various sizes.  On a Linux
> machine, I see this:
>
>     log2(n) | fseeko  | fread
>    ---------+---------+-------
>           1 | 109.288 | 5.528
>           2 |  54.881 | 2.848
>           3 |   27.65 | 1.504
>           4 |  13.953 | 0.834
>           5 |     7.1 |  0.49
>           6 |   3.665 | 0.322
>           7 |   1.944 | 0.244
>           8 |   1.085 | 0.201
>           9 |   0.658 | 0.185
>          10 |   0.443 | 0.175
>          11 |   0.253 | 0.171
>          12 |   0.102 | 0.162
>          13 |   0.075 |  0.13
>          14 |   0.061 | 0.114
>          15 |   0.054 |   0.1
>
> So, fseeko() starts winning around 4096 bytes.  On macOS, the differences
> aren't quite as dramatic, but 4096 bytes is the break-even point there,
> too.  I imagine there's a buffer around that size somewhere...

Thank you for benchmarking! Before answering in more depth, I'm curious, 
what read-seek pattern do you see on the system call level (as 
shown by strace)? In pg_restore it was a constant loop of 
read(4K)-lseek(8-16K).

Dimitris





view thread (47+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <c8d94212-72cc-cd9f-162f-8eb845ba104f@gmx.net>
Permalink:  ../c8d94212-72cc-cd9f-162f-8eb845ba104f@gmx.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/c8d94212-72cc-cd9f-162f-8eb845ba104f@gmx.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: jimis@gmx.net, nathandbossart@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward
  In-Reply-To: <c8d94212-72cc-cd9f-162f-8eb845ba104f@gmx.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox