From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Gasper Zejn <zejn@owca.info>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pglz performance
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:03:48 +0100
Message-ID: <c9adbdc6-3e41-728c-71ce-1be3ec951a56@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191101154828.GA15829@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20191101154828.GA15829@alvherre.pgsql>
On 2019-11-01 16:48, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> As I understand that report, in these results "less is better", so the
> hacked8 variant shows better performance (33.8) than current (42.5).
> The "hacked" variant shows worse performance (48.2) that the current
> code.
Which appears to be the opposite of, or at least inconsistent with,
results earlier in the thread.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, x4mmm@yandex-team.ru, zejn@owca.info, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pglz performance
In-Reply-To: <c9adbdc6-3e41-728c-71ce-1be3ec951a56@2ndquadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox