public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Drouvot, Bertrand <[email protected]>
To: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Gregory Stark (as CFM) <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Generate pg_stat_get_xact*() functions with Macros
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 07:45:26 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAM-w4HNq0SmbDa1jCtbmtCzWrx6G7qAGxsjzcOdEyceGOAdJmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

Hi,

On 3/27/23 3:20 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 11:50:50AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 06:58:30AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>>> - Does not include the refactoring for
>>> pg_stat_get_xact_function_total_time(),
>>> pg_stat_get_xact_function_self_time(),
>>> pg_stat_get_function_total_time() and
>>> pg_stat_get_function_self_time(). I think they can be done in a
>>> dedicated commit once we agree on the renaming for
>>> PG_STAT_GET_DBENTRY_FLOAT8 (see Andres's comment up-thread) so that
>>> the new macros can match the future agreement.
> 
> Thanks for the reminder.  I have completely missed that this is
> mentioned in [1], and that it is all about 8018ffb.  The suggestion to
> prefix the macro names with a "_MS" to outline the conversion sounds
> like a good one seen from here.  So please find attached a patch to do
> this adjustment, completed with a similar switch for the two counters
> of the function entries.
> 

Thanks! LGTM, but what about also taking care of pg_stat_get_xact_function_total_time()
and pg_stat_get_xact_function_self_time() while at it?

>>> - Does include the refactoring of the new
>>> - pg_stat_get_xact_tuples_newpage_updated() function (added in
>>> - ae4fdde135)
>>
>> Fine by me.  One step is better than no steps, and this helps:
>>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>>
>> I'll go apply that if there are no objections.
> 
> Just did this part to shave a bit more code.

Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Generate pg_stat_get_xact*() functions with Macros
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox