pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Add statistics to pg_stat_wal view for wal related parameter tuning
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 10:25:07 +0900
Message-ID: <e3135545ffe792d6d636ebc40ebf022d@oss.nttdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7e4a0b8-7341-9393-2d24-ffd9a3b2f852@oss.nttdata.com>
References: <35ef960128b90bfae3b3fdf60a3a860f@oss.nttdata.com>
	<a7e4a0b8-7341-9393-2d24-ffd9a3b2f852@oss.nttdata.com>

On 2020-10-30 11:50, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/10/29 17:03, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thanks for your comments and advice. I updated the patch.
>> 
>> On 2020-10-21 18:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>>> At Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:11:29 +0900, Masahiro Ikeda
>>> <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in
>>>> On 2020-10-20 12:46, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>>> > I see that we also need to add extra code to capture these stats (some
>>>> > of which is in performance-critical path especially in
>>>> > XLogInsertRecord) which again makes me a bit uncomfortable. It might
>>>> > be that it is all fine as it is very important to collect these stats
>>>> > at cluster-level in spite that the same information can be gathered at
>>>> > statement-level to help customers but I don't see a very strong case
>>>> > for that in your proposal.
>>> 
>>> We should avoid that duplication as possible even if the both number
>>> are important.
>>> 
>>>> Also about performance, I thought there are few impacts because it
>>>> increments stats in memory. If I can implement to reuse pgWalUsage's
>>>> value which already collects these stats, there is no impact in
>>>> XLogInsertRecord.
>>>> For example, how about pg_stat_wal() calculates the accumulated
>>>> value of wal_records, wal_fpi, and wal_bytes to use pgWalUsage's
>>>> value?
>>> 
>>> I don't think that works, but it would work that pgstat_send_wal()
>>> takes the difference of that values between two successive calls.
>>> 
>>> WalUsage prevWalUsage;
>>> ...
>>> pgstat_send_wal()
>>> {
>>> ..
>>>    /* fill in some values using pgWalUsage */
>>>    WalStats.m_wal_bytes   = pgWalUsage.wal_bytes   - 
>>> prevWalUsage.wal_bytes;
>>>    WalStats.m_wal_records = pgWalUsage.wal_records - 
>>> prevWalUsage.wal_records;
>>>    WalStats.m_wal_wal_fpi = pgWalUsage.wal_fpi     - 
>>> prevWalUsage.wal_fpi;
>>> ...
>>>    pgstat_send(&WalStats, sizeof(WalStats));
>>> 
>>>    /* remember the current numbers */
>>>    prevWalUsage = pgWalUsage;
>> 
>> Thanks for Horiguchi-san's advice, I changed to reuse pgWalUsage
>> which is already defined and eliminates the extra overhead.
> 
> +	/* fill in some values using pgWalUsage */
> +	WalStats.m_wal_bytes = pgWalUsage.wal_bytes - prevWalUsage.wal_bytes;
> +	WalStats.m_wal_records = pgWalUsage.wal_records - 
> prevWalUsage.wal_records;
> +	WalStats.m_wal_fpi = pgWalUsage.wal_fpi - prevWalUsage.wal_fpi;
> 
> It's better to use WalUsageAccumDiff() here?

Yes, thanks. I fixed it.

> prevWalUsage needs to be initialized with pgWalUsage?
> 
> +				if (AmWalWriterProcess()){
> +					WalStats.m_wal_write_walwriter++;
> +				}
> +				else
> +				{
> +					WalStats.m_wal_write_backend++;
> +				}
> 
> I think that it's better not to separate m_wal_write_xxx into two for
> walwriter and other processes. Instead, we can use one m_wal_write_xxx
> counter and make pgstat_send_wal() send also the process type to
> the stats collector. Then the stats collector can accumulate the 
> counters
> per process type if necessary. If we adopt this approach, we can easily
> extend pg_stat_wal so that any fields can be reported per process type.

I'll remove the above source code because these counters are not useful.


On 2020-10-30 12:00, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/10/20 11:31, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I think we need to add some statistics to pg_stat_wal view.
>> 
>> Although there are some parameter related WAL,
>> there are few statistics for tuning them.
>> 
>> I think it's better to provide the following statistics.
>> Please let me know your comments.
>> 
>> ```
>> postgres=# SELECT * from pg_stat_wal;
>> -[ RECORD 1 ]-------+------------------------------
>> wal_records         | 2000224
>> wal_fpi             | 47
>> wal_bytes           | 248216337
>> wal_buffers_full    | 20954
>> wal_init_file       | 8
>> wal_write_backend   | 20960
>> wal_write_walwriter | 46
>> wal_write_time      | 51
>> wal_sync_backend    | 7
>> wal_sync_walwriter  | 8
>> wal_sync_time       | 0
>> stats_reset         | 2020-10-20 11:04:51.307771+09
>> ```
>> 
>> 1. Basic statistics of WAL activity
>> 
>> - wal_records: Total number of WAL records generated
>> - wal_fpi: Total number of WAL full page images generated
>> - wal_bytes: Total amount of WAL bytes generated
>> 
>> To understand DB's performance, first, we will check the performance
>> trends for the entire database instance.
>> For example, if the number of wal_fpi becomes higher, users may tune
>> "wal_compression", "checkpoint_timeout" and so on.
>> 
>> Although users can check the above statistics via EXPLAIN, 
>> auto_explain,
>> autovacuum and pg_stat_statements now,
>> if users want to see the performance trends  for the entire database,
>> they must recalculate the statistics.
>> 
>> I think it is useful to add the sum of the basic statistics.
>> 
>> 
>> 2.  WAL segment file creation
>> 
>> - wal_init_file: Total number of WAL segment files created.
>> 
>> To create a new WAL file may have an impact on the performance of
>> a write-heavy workload generating lots of WAL. If this number is 
>> reported high,
>> to reduce the number of this initialization, we can tune WAL-related 
>> parameters
>> so that more "recycled" WAL files can be held.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 3. Number of when WAL is flushed
>> 
>> - wal_write_backend : Total number of WAL data written to the disk by 
>> backends
>> - wal_write_walwriter : Total number of WAL data written to the disk 
>> by walwriter
>> - wal_sync_backend : Total number of WAL data synced to the disk by 
>> backends
>> - wal_sync_walwriter : Total number of WAL data synced to the disk by 
>> walwrite
>> 
>> I think it's useful for tuning "synchronous_commit" and "commit_delay" 
>> for query executions.
>> If the number of WAL is flushed is high, users can know 
>> "synchronous_commit" is useful for the workload.
> 
> I just wonder how useful these counters are. Even without these 
> counters,
> we already know synchronous_commit=off is likely to cause the better
> performance (but has the risk of data loss). So ISTM that these 
> counters are
> not so useful when tuning synchronous_commit.

Thanks, my understanding was wrong.
I agreed that your comments.

I merged the statistics of *_backend and *_walwriter.
I think the sum of them is useful to calculate the average per 
write/sync time.
For example, per write time is equals wal_write_time / wal_write.

Regards,
-- 
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachments:

0003_add_statistics_to_pg_stat_wal_view.patch (text/x-diff, 13.6K) download diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml index 98e19954..fd43942e 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml @@ -3447,12 +3447,88 @@ SELECT pid, wait_event_type, wait_event FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE wait_event i </thead> <tbody> + <row> + <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> + <structfield>wal_records</structfield> <type>bigint</type> + </para> + <para> + Total number of WAL records generated + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> + <structfield>wal_fpi</structfield> <type>bigint</type> + </para> + <para> + Total number of WAL full page images generated + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> + <structfield>wal_bytes</structfield> <type>bigint</type> + </para> + <para> + Total amount of WAL bytes generated + </para></entry> + </row> + <row> <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> <structfield>wal_buffers_full</structfield> <type>bigint</type> </para> <para> - Number of times WAL data was written to the disk because WAL buffers got full + Total number of times WAL data written to the disk because WAL buffers got full + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> + <structfield>wal_init_file</structfield> <type>bigint</type> + </para> + <para> + Total number of WAL file segment created + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> + <structfield>wal_write</structfield> <type>bigint</type> + </para> + <para> + Total number of times to write WAL data to the disk + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> + <structfield>wal_write_time</structfield> <type>bigint</type> + </para> + <para> + Total amount of time that has been spent in the portion of + WAL data was written to disk by backend and walwriter, in milliseconds + (if <xref linkend="guc-track-io-timing"/> is enabled, otherwise zero) + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> + <structfield>wal_sync</structfield> <type>bigint</type> + </para> + <para> + Total number of times to sync WAL data to the disk + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition"> + <structfield>wal_sync_time</structfield> <type>bigint</type> + </para> + <para> + Total amount of time that has been spent in the portion of + WAL data was synced to disk by backend and walwriter, in milliseconds + (if <xref linkend="guc-track-io-timing"/> is enabled, otherwise zero) </para></entry> </row> diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index e081bf92..c6d2f8ab 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -2527,6 +2527,8 @@ XLogWrite(XLogwrtRqst WriteRqst, bool flexible) Size nbytes; Size nleft; int written; + instr_time start; + instr_time duration; /* OK to write the page(s) */ from = XLogCtl->pages + startidx * (Size) XLOG_BLCKSZ; @@ -2535,9 +2537,22 @@ XLogWrite(XLogwrtRqst WriteRqst, bool flexible) do { errno = 0; + if (track_io_timing) + INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(start); + pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_WAL_WRITE); written = pg_pwrite(openLogFile, from, nleft, startoffset); pgstat_report_wait_end(); + + if (track_io_timing) + { + INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(duration); + INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT(duration, start); + WalStats.m_wal_write_time += INSTR_TIME_GET_MILLISEC(duration); + } + + WalStats.m_wal_write++; + if (written <= 0) { char xlogfname[MAXFNAMELEN]; @@ -3418,6 +3433,7 @@ XLogFileInit(XLogSegNo logsegno, bool *use_existent, bool use_lock) errmsg("could not open file \"%s\": %m", path))); elog(DEBUG2, "done creating and filling new WAL file"); + WalStats.m_wal_init_file++; return fd; } @@ -10426,8 +10442,13 @@ assign_xlog_sync_method(int new_sync_method, void *extra) void issue_xlog_fsync(int fd, XLogSegNo segno) { + instr_time start; + instr_time duration; char *msg = NULL; + if (track_io_timing) + INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(start); + pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_WAL_SYNC); switch (sync_method) { @@ -10471,6 +10492,15 @@ issue_xlog_fsync(int fd, XLogSegNo segno) } pgstat_report_wait_end(); + + if (track_io_timing) + { + INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(duration); + INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT(duration, start); + WalStats.m_wal_sync_time += INSTR_TIME_GET_MILLISEC(duration); + } + + WalStats.m_wal_sync++; } /* diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql b/src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql index 2e4aa1c4..897bb59b 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql +++ b/src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql @@ -993,7 +993,15 @@ CREATE VIEW pg_stat_bgwriter AS CREATE VIEW pg_stat_wal AS SELECT + w.wal_records, + w.wal_fpi, + w.wal_bytes, w.wal_buffers_full, + w.wal_init_file, + w.wal_write, + w.wal_write_time, + w.wal_sync, + w.wal_sync_time, w.stats_reset FROM pg_stat_get_wal() w; diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c b/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c index f1dca2f2..66b5b4f9 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ #include "catalog/pg_database.h" #include "catalog/pg_proc.h" #include "common/ip.h" +#include "executor/instrument.h" #include "libpq/libpq.h" #include "libpq/pqsignal.h" #include "mb/pg_wchar.h" @@ -142,6 +143,7 @@ char *pgstat_stat_tmpname = NULL; */ PgStat_MsgBgWriter BgWriterStats; PgStat_MsgWal WalStats; +WalUsage prevWalUsage; /* * List of SLRU names that we keep stats for. There is no central registry of @@ -4574,6 +4576,15 @@ pgstat_send_bgwriter(void) void pgstat_send_wal(void) { + /* fill in some values using pgWalUsage */ + WalUsage walusage; + memset(&walusage, 0, sizeof(WalUsage)); + WalUsageAccumDiff(&walusage, &pgWalUsage, &prevWalUsage); + + WalStats.m_wal_bytes = walusage.wal_bytes; + WalStats.m_wal_records = walusage.wal_records; + WalStats.m_wal_fpi = walusage.wal_fpi; + /* We assume this initializes to zeroes */ static const PgStat_MsgWal all_zeroes; @@ -4591,6 +4602,9 @@ pgstat_send_wal(void) pgstat_setheader(&WalStats.m_hdr, PGSTAT_MTYPE_WAL); pgstat_send(&WalStats, sizeof(WalStats)); + /* remember the current numbers */ + prevWalUsage = pgWalUsage; + /* * Clear out the statistics buffer, so it can be re-used. */ @@ -6759,7 +6773,15 @@ pgstat_recv_bgwriter(PgStat_MsgBgWriter *msg, int len) static void pgstat_recv_wal(PgStat_MsgWal *msg, int len) { + walStats.wal_records += msg->m_wal_records; + walStats.wal_fpi += msg->m_wal_fpi; + walStats.wal_bytes += msg->m_wal_bytes; walStats.wal_buffers_full += msg->m_wal_buffers_full; + walStats.wal_init_file += msg->m_wal_init_file; + walStats.wal_write += msg->m_wal_write; + walStats.wal_write_time += msg->m_wal_write_time; + walStats.wal_sync += msg->m_wal_sync; + walStats.wal_sync_time += msg->m_wal_sync_time; } /* ---------- diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/walwriter.c b/src/backend/postmaster/walwriter.c index a52832fe..ce9f4b7c 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/walwriter.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/walwriter.c @@ -253,6 +253,9 @@ WalWriterMain(void) else if (left_till_hibernate > 0) left_till_hibernate--; + /* Send WAL statistics */ + pgstat_send_wal(); + /* * Sleep until we are signaled or WalWriterDelay has elapsed. If we * haven't done anything useful for quite some time, lengthen the diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c index a210fc93..55733c70 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c @@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ pg_stat_get_buf_alloc(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) Datum pg_stat_get_wal(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { -#define PG_STAT_GET_WAL_COLS 2 +#define PG_STAT_GET_WAL_COLS 10 TupleDesc tupdesc; Datum values[PG_STAT_GET_WAL_COLS]; bool nulls[PG_STAT_GET_WAL_COLS]; @@ -1715,9 +1715,25 @@ pg_stat_get_wal(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) /* Initialise attributes information in the tuple descriptor */ tupdesc = CreateTemplateTupleDesc(PG_STAT_GET_WAL_COLS); - TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 1, "wal_buffers_full", + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 1, "wal_records", INT8OID, -1, 0); - TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 2, "stats_reset", + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 2, "wal_fpi", + INT8OID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 3, "wal_bytes", + INT8OID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 4, "wal_buffers_full", + INT8OID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 5, "wal_init_file", + INT8OID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 6, "wal_write", + INT8OID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 7, "wal_write_time", + INT8OID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 8, "wal_sync", + INT8OID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 9, "wal_sync_time", + INT8OID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 10, "stats_reset", TIMESTAMPTZOID, -1, 0); BlessTupleDesc(tupdesc); @@ -1726,8 +1742,16 @@ pg_stat_get_wal(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) wal_stats = pgstat_fetch_stat_wal(); /* Fill values and NULLs */ - values[0] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_buffers_full); - values[1] = TimestampTzGetDatum(wal_stats->stat_reset_timestamp); + values[0] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_records); + values[1] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_fpi); + values[2] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_bytes); + values[3] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_buffers_full); + values[4] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_init_file); + values[5] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_write); + values[6] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_write_time); + values[7] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_sync); + values[8] = Int64GetDatum(wal_stats->wal_sync_time); + values[9] = TimestampTzGetDatum(wal_stats->stat_reset_timestamp); /* Returns the record as Datum */ PG_RETURN_DATUM(HeapTupleGetDatum(heap_form_tuple(tupdesc, values, nulls))); diff --git a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat index 88378953..55ff937c 100644 --- a/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat +++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat @@ -5491,9 +5491,9 @@ { oid => '1136', descr => 'statistics: information about WAL activity', proname => 'pg_stat_get_wal', proisstrict => 'f', provolatile => 's', proparallel => 'r', prorettype => 'record', proargtypes => '', - proallargtypes => '{int8,timestamptz}', - proargmodes => '{o,o}', - proargnames => '{wal_buffers_full,stats_reset}', + proallargtypes => '{int8,int8,int8,int8,int8,int8,int8,int8,int8,timestamptz}', + proargmodes => '{o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o,o}', + proargnames => '{wal_records,wal_fpi,wal_bytes,wal_buffers_full,wal_init_file,wal_write,wal_write_time,wal_sync,wal_sync_time,stats_reset}', prosrc => 'pg_stat_get_wal' }, { oid => '2306', descr => 'statistics: information about SLRU caches', diff --git a/src/include/pgstat.h b/src/include/pgstat.h index 257e515b..16ce9246 100644 --- a/src/include/pgstat.h +++ b/src/include/pgstat.h @@ -459,7 +459,15 @@ typedef struct PgStat_MsgBgWriter typedef struct PgStat_MsgWal { PgStat_MsgHdr m_hdr; + PgStat_Counter m_wal_records; + PgStat_Counter m_wal_fpi; + PgStat_Counter m_wal_bytes; PgStat_Counter m_wal_buffers_full; + PgStat_Counter m_wal_init_file; + PgStat_Counter m_wal_write; + PgStat_Counter m_wal_write_time; /* accumulate times in milliseconds */ + PgStat_Counter m_wal_sync; + PgStat_Counter m_wal_sync_time; /* accumulate times in milliseconds */ } PgStat_MsgWal; /* ---------- @@ -798,7 +806,16 @@ typedef struct PgStat_GlobalStats */ typedef struct PgStat_WalStats { + PgStat_Counter wal_records; + PgStat_Counter wal_fpi; + PgStat_Counter wal_bytes; PgStat_Counter wal_buffers_full; + PgStat_Counter wal_init_file; + PgStat_Counter wal_write; + PgStat_Counter wal_write_time; + PgStat_Counter wal_sync; + PgStat_Counter wal_sync_time; + TimestampTz stat_reset_timestamp; } PgStat_WalStats; diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out b/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out index 097ff5d1..302ecaa8 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out @@ -2138,9 +2138,17 @@ pg_stat_user_tables| SELECT pg_stat_all_tables.relid, pg_stat_all_tables.autoanalyze_count FROM pg_stat_all_tables WHERE ((pg_stat_all_tables.schemaname <> ALL (ARRAY['pg_catalog'::name, 'information_schema'::name])) AND (pg_stat_all_tables.schemaname !~ '^pg_toast'::text)); -pg_stat_wal| SELECT w.wal_buffers_full, +pg_stat_wal| SELECT w.wal_records, + w.wal_fpi, + w.wal_bytes, + w.wal_buffers_full, + w.wal_init_file, + w.wal_write, + w.wal_write_time, + w.wal_sync, + w.wal_sync_time, w.stats_reset - FROM pg_stat_get_wal() w(wal_buffers_full, stats_reset); + FROM pg_stat_get_wal() w(wal_records, wal_fpi, wal_bytes, wal_buffers_full, wal_init_file, wal_write, wal_write_time, wal_sync, wal_sync_time, stats_reset); pg_stat_wal_receiver| SELECT s.pid, s.status, s.receive_start_lsn,

view thread (33+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <e3135545ffe792d6d636ebc40ebf022d@oss.nttdata.com>
Permalink:  ../e3135545ffe792d6d636ebc40ebf022d@oss.nttdata.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/e3135545ffe792d6d636ebc40ebf022d@oss.nttdata.com

 ·  · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com
  Subject: Re: Add statistics to pg_stat_wal view for wal related parameter tuning
  In-Reply-To: <e3135545ffe792d6d636ebc40ebf022d@oss.nttdata.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox