pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jürgen Strobel <juergen+postgresql@strobel.info>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:06:45 +0100
Message-ID: <ebcf4a32-cfee-8a8f-525d-6ceaa72c75d8@strobel.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5662.1542040384@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20181112140051.yv5m77esq5jz6rkg@alvherre.pgsql>
	<5662.1542040384@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On 2018-11-12 17:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> One of the guiding principles that I think we should hold for
>> partitioning is that operating directly into the partition should be
>> seen as only an optimization compared to inserting into the parent table
>> -- thus it should not behave differently.  Applying different default
>> values depending on where you're inserting into goes counter to that
>> principle.
> 
> I'm not entirely convinced that I buy that argument, especially not in
> a case like this where it introduces logical inconsistencies where there
> otherwise wouldn't be any.
> 

I think I missed something, what are the *introduced* logical problems?
Apart from implementation issues the only logical problems I see are if
you allow to change defaults of the partition key columns, and these are
problematic (nonsensical really) in either case.

Regards,
Jürgen




view thread (44+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <ebcf4a32-cfee-8a8f-525d-6ceaa72c75d8@strobel.info>
Permalink:  ../ebcf4a32-cfee-8a8f-525d-6ceaa72c75d8@strobel.info/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/ebcf4a32-cfee-8a8f-525d-6ceaa72c75d8@strobel.info

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: juergen+postgresql@strobel.info, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation
  In-Reply-To: <ebcf4a32-cfee-8a8f-525d-6ceaa72c75d8@strobel.info>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox