From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
To: Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 12:15:39 -0700
Message-ID: <ebda05062491d00f84d87f6edd7d90022ebf1c37.camel@j-davis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b3df50c-3195-4f40-e04f-c25f489383f7@joeconway.com>
References: <45f0cd77-9c85-4c5e-9396-adbccdb635e2@manitou-mail.org>
<6b3df50c-3195-4f40-e04f-c25f489383f7@joeconway.com>
On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 14:11 -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> This discussion makes me wonder (though probably too late for the v16
> cycle) if we shouldn't treat "C" and "POSIX" locales to be a third
> provider, something like "internal".
That's exactly what I did in v6 of this series: I created a "none"
provider, and when someone specified provider=icu iculocale=C, it would
change the provider to "none":
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5f9bf4a0b040428c5db2dc1f23cc3ad96acb5672.camel%40j-davis.com
I'm fine with either approach.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql@j-davis.com, mail@joeconway.com, daniel@manitou-mail.org, peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
In-Reply-To: <ebda05062491d00f84d87f6edd7d90022ebf1c37.camel@j-davis.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox