pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:12:38 +0200
Message-ID: <f3723966-022a-fb74-06f4-3801f4fb7c1b@postgresfriends.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2feac44-b4c5-f38f-3699-2851d6a76dc9@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <f2feac44-b4c5-f38f-3699-2851d6a76dc9@2ndquadrant.com>

On 6/24/20 8:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I was checking some loose ends in SQL conformance, when I noticed: We
> support GRANT role ... GRANTED BY CURRENT_USER, but we don't support
> CURRENT_ROLE in that place, even though in PostgreSQL they are
> equivalent.  Here is a trivial patch to add that.


The only thing that isn't dead-obvious about this patch is the commit
message says "[PATCH 1/2]".  What is in the other part?

Assuming that's just a remnant of development, this LGTM.
-- 
Vik Fearing





view thread (18+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <f3723966-022a-fb74-06f4-3801f4fb7c1b@postgresfriends.org>
Permalink:  ../f3723966-022a-fb74-06f4-3801f4fb7c1b@postgresfriends.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/f3723966-022a-fb74-06f4-3801f4fb7c1b@postgresfriends.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: vik@postgresfriends.org, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY
  In-Reply-To: <f3723966-022a-fb74-06f4-3801f4fb7c1b@postgresfriends.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox