From: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 21:27:26 +0200
Message-ID: <f8c653e8-c1e8-c563-4963-1b80562d2c1f@postgresfriends.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200518170323.GA14610@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20200518170323.GA14610@alvherre.pgsql>
On 5/18/20 7:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-May-18, Vik Fearing wrote:
>
>> The syntax for FETCH FIRST allows the <fetch first quantity> to be
>> absent (implying 1).
>>
>> We implement this correctly for ONLY, but WITH TIES didn't get the memo.
>
> Oops, yes. I added a test. Will get this pushed immediately after I
> see beta1 produced.
Thanks!
--
Vik Fearing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: vik@postgresfriends.org, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES
In-Reply-To: <f8c653e8-c1e8-c563-4963-1b80562d2c1f@postgresfriends.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox