pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Roger Harkavy <rogerharkavy@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Subject: Re: Add A Glossary
Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 11:08:02 +0200
Message-ID: <fcc01959cf90a5755819c50ae8005efa@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200517065126.GA20730@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20200517065126.GA20730@alvherre.pgsql>

On 2020-05-17 08:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-May-17, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> 
>> On 15.05.20 02:00, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> > Thanks everybody.  I have compiled together all the suggestions and the
>> >
>> > * I changed "instance", and made "cluster" be mostly a synonym of that.
>> In my understanding, "instance" and "cluster" should be different 
>> things,
> 
> I don't think that's the general understanding of those terms.  For all
> I know, they *are* synonyms, and there's no specific term for "the
> fluctuating objects" as you call them.  The instance is either running
> (in which case there are processes and RAM) or it isn't.

For what it's worth, I've also always understood 'instance' as 'a 
running database'.  I admit it might be a left-over from my oracle 
years:

   
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e40540/startup.htm#CNCPT601

There, 'instance' clearly refers to a running database.  When that 
database is stopped, it ceases to be an instance.  I've always 
understood this to be the same for the PostgreSQL 'instance'.  Once 
stopped, it is no longer an instance, but it is, of course, still a 
cluster.

I know, we don't have to do the same as Oracle, but clearly it's going 
to be an ongoing source of misunderstanding if we define such a 
high-level term differently.

Erik Rijkers





view thread (97+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <fcc01959cf90a5755819c50ae8005efa@xs4all.nl>
Permalink:  ../fcc01959cf90a5755819c50ae8005efa@xs4all.nl/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/fcc01959cf90a5755819c50ae8005efa@xs4all.nl

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: er@xs4all.nl, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, juergen@purtz.de, laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, coelho@cri.ensmp.fr, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, corey.huinker@gmail.com, pryzby@telsasoft.com, rogerharkavy@gmail.com, michael@paquier.xyz
  Subject: Re: Add A Glossary
  In-Reply-To: <fcc01959cf90a5755819c50ae8005efa@xs4all.nl>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox