From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: generate documentation keywords table automatically
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:45:05 +0200
Message-ID: <fd3df804-bf09-2b08-264b-c4985d25ded1@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21977.1556378722@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <07daeadd-8c82-0d95-5e19-e350502cb749@2ndquadrant.com>
<21977.1556378722@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2019-04-27 17:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Would it make more sense to have just one source file per SQL standard
> version, and distinguish the keyword types by labels within the file?
The way I have written it, the lists can be compared directly with the
relevant standards by a human. Otherwise we'd need another level of
tooling to compose and verify those lists.
> A policy issue, independent of this mechanism, is how many different
> SQL spec versions we want to show in the table.
We had previously established that we want to show 92 and the latest
two. I don't propose to change that.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: generate documentation keywords table automatically
In-Reply-To: <fd3df804-bf09-2b08-264b-c4985d25ded1@2ndquadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox