From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:22:01 -0400
Message-ID: <fd90cca4-db1c-b760-dd17-eafa304020d6@2ndQuadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24665.1501214288@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20540.1501210115@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<24665.1501214288@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 07/27/2017 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I kinda suspect we're not actively testing non-MULTIPLICITY builds
> either. The 5.8.7 test I just ran was with a non-MULTIPLICITY build,
> so the case doesn't seem actively broken, but I doubt there is any
> buildfarm coverage. I wonder if it'd be worth getting the buildfarm
> to log the output of "perl -V" so we could get a clearer picture
> of what's being tested.
>
It's quite possible, but in general it will need a new buildfarm client release. If you choose a few possibly critical animals we can ask the owners to apply a fairly simple patch.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
In-Reply-To: <fd90cca4-db1c-b760-dd17-eafa304020d6@2ndQuadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox