agora inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

[PATCH 2/5] Refactor index_concurrently_create_copy() for use with REPACK (CONCURRENTLY).
44+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* [PATCH 2/5] Refactor index_concurrently_create_copy() for use with REPACK (CONCURRENTLY).
@ 2026-02-27 18:01 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-02-27 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)

This patch moves the code to index_create_copy() and adds a "concurrently"
parameter so it can be used by REPACK (CONCURRENTLY).

With the CONCURRENTLY option, REPACK cannot simply swap the heap file and
rebuild its indexes. Instead, it needs to build a separate set of indexes
(including system catalog entries) *before* the actual swap, to reduce the
time AccessExclusiveLock needs to be held for.
---
 src/backend/catalog/index.c      | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c |  6 ++--
 src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c    |  9 +++---
 src/include/catalog/index.h      |  3 ++
 src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h    |  4 ++-
 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
index 5ee6389d39c..f8e6c3d804e 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
@@ -1288,15 +1288,32 @@ index_create(Relation heapRelation,
 /*
  * index_concurrently_create_copy
  *
- * Create concurrently an index based on the definition of the one provided by
- * caller.  The index is inserted into catalogs and needs to be built later
- * on.  This is called during concurrent reindex processing.
- *
- * "tablespaceOid" is the tablespace to use for this index.
+ * Variant of index_create_copy(), called during concurrent reindex
+ * processing.
  */
 Oid
 index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 							   Oid tablespaceOid, const char *newName)
+{
+	return index_create_copy(heapRelation, oldIndexId, tablespaceOid, newName,
+							 true);
+}
+
+/*
+ * index_create_copy
+ *
+ * Create an index based on the definition of the one provided by caller.  The
+ * index is inserted into catalogs. If 'concurrently' is TRUE, it needs to be
+ * built later on, otherwise it's built immediately.
+ *
+ * "tablespaceOid" is the tablespace to use for this index.
+ *
+ * The actual implementation of index_concurrently_create_copy(), reusable for
+ * other purposes.
+ */
+Oid
+index_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId, Oid tablespaceOid,
+				  const char *newName, bool concurrently)
 {
 	Relation	indexRelation;
 	IndexInfo  *oldInfo,
@@ -1315,6 +1332,7 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 	List	   *indexColNames = NIL;
 	List	   *indexExprs = NIL;
 	List	   *indexPreds = NIL;
+	int			flags = 0;
 
 	indexRelation = index_open(oldIndexId, RowExclusiveLock);
 
@@ -1325,7 +1343,7 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 	 * Concurrent build of an index with exclusion constraints is not
 	 * supported.
 	 */
-	if (oldInfo->ii_ExclusionOps != NULL)
+	if (oldInfo->ii_ExclusionOps != NULL && concurrently)
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
 				 errmsg("concurrent index creation for exclusion constraints is not supported")));
@@ -1381,9 +1399,7 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Build the index information for the new index.  Note that rebuild of
-	 * indexes with exclusion constraints is not supported, hence there is no
-	 * need to fill all the ii_Exclusion* fields.
+	 * Build the index information for the new index.
 	 */
 	newInfo = makeIndexInfo(oldInfo->ii_NumIndexAttrs,
 							oldInfo->ii_NumIndexKeyAttrs,
@@ -1392,10 +1408,13 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 							indexPreds,
 							oldInfo->ii_Unique,
 							oldInfo->ii_NullsNotDistinct,
-							false,	/* not ready for inserts */
-							true,
+							!concurrently,	/* isready */
+							concurrently,	/* concurrent */
 							indexRelation->rd_indam->amsummarizing,
-							oldInfo->ii_WithoutOverlaps);
+							oldInfo->ii_WithoutOverlaps,
+							oldInfo->ii_ExclusionOps,
+							oldInfo->ii_ExclusionProcs,
+							oldInfo->ii_ExclusionStrats);
 
 	/*
 	 * Extract the list of column names and the column numbers for the new
@@ -1433,6 +1452,9 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 		stattargets[i].isnull = isnull;
 	}
 
+	if (concurrently)
+		flags = INDEX_CREATE_SKIP_BUILD | INDEX_CREATE_CONCURRENT;
+
 	/*
 	 * Now create the new index.
 	 *
@@ -1456,7 +1478,7 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 							  indcoloptions->values,
 							  stattargets,
 							  reloptionsDatum,
-							  INDEX_CREATE_SKIP_BUILD | INDEX_CREATE_CONCURRENT,
+							  flags,
 							  0,
 							  true, /* allow table to be a system catalog? */
 							  false,	/* is_internal? */
@@ -2450,7 +2472,8 @@ BuildIndexInfo(Relation index)
 					   indexStruct->indisready,
 					   false,
 					   index->rd_indam->amsummarizing,
-					   indexStruct->indisexclusion && indexStruct->indisunique);
+					   indexStruct->indisexclusion && indexStruct->indisunique,
+					   NULL, NULL, NULL);
 
 	/* fill in attribute numbers */
 	for (i = 0; i < numAtts; i++)
@@ -2510,7 +2533,8 @@ BuildDummyIndexInfo(Relation index)
 					   indexStruct->indisready,
 					   false,
 					   index->rd_indam->amsummarizing,
-					   indexStruct->indisexclusion && indexStruct->indisunique);
+					   indexStruct->indisexclusion && indexStruct->indisunique,
+					   NULL, NULL, NULL);
 
 	/* fill in attribute numbers */
 	for (i = 0; i < numAtts; i++)
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
index 635679cc1f2..34209bd1393 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
@@ -243,7 +243,8 @@ CheckIndexCompatible(Oid oldId,
 	 */
 	indexInfo = makeIndexInfo(numberOfAttributes, numberOfAttributes,
 							  accessMethodId, NIL, NIL, false, false,
-							  false, false, amsummarizing, isWithoutOverlaps);
+							  false, false, amsummarizing, isWithoutOverlaps,
+							  NULL, NULL, NULL);
 	typeIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
 	collationIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
 	opclassIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
@@ -930,7 +931,8 @@ DefineIndex(ParseState *pstate,
 							  !concurrent,
 							  concurrent,
 							  amissummarizing,
-							  stmt->iswithoutoverlaps);
+							  stmt->iswithoutoverlaps,
+							  NULL, NULL, NULL);
 
 	typeIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
 	collationIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c
index 2caec621d73..ca7e21e8349 100644
--- a/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c
@@ -834,7 +834,8 @@ IndexInfo *
 makeIndexInfo(int numattrs, int numkeyattrs, Oid amoid, List *expressions,
 			  List *predicates, bool unique, bool nulls_not_distinct,
 			  bool isready, bool concurrent, bool summarizing,
-			  bool withoutoverlaps)
+			  bool withoutoverlaps, Oid *exclusion_ops, Oid *exclusion_procs,
+			  uint16 *exclusion_strats)
 {
 	IndexInfo  *n = makeNode(IndexInfo);
 
@@ -863,9 +864,9 @@ makeIndexInfo(int numattrs, int numkeyattrs, Oid amoid, List *expressions,
 	n->ii_PredicateState = NULL;
 
 	/* exclusion constraints */
-	n->ii_ExclusionOps = NULL;
-	n->ii_ExclusionProcs = NULL;
-	n->ii_ExclusionStrats = NULL;
+	n->ii_ExclusionOps = exclusion_ops;
+	n->ii_ExclusionProcs = exclusion_procs;
+	n->ii_ExclusionStrats = exclusion_strats;
 
 	/* speculative inserts */
 	n->ii_UniqueOps = NULL;
diff --git a/src/include/catalog/index.h b/src/include/catalog/index.h
index b259c4141ed..3426087b445 100644
--- a/src/include/catalog/index.h
+++ b/src/include/catalog/index.h
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ extern Oid	index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation,
 										   Oid oldIndexId,
 										   Oid tablespaceOid,
 										   const char *newName);
+extern Oid	index_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
+							  Oid tablespaceOid, const char *newName,
+							  bool concurrently);
 
 extern void index_concurrently_build(Oid heapRelationId,
 									 Oid indexRelationId);
diff --git a/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h b/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h
index 982ec25ae14..dcea148ae1a 100644
--- a/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h
+++ b/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h
@@ -99,7 +99,9 @@ extern IndexInfo *makeIndexInfo(int numattrs, int numkeyattrs, Oid amoid,
 								List *expressions, List *predicates,
 								bool unique, bool nulls_not_distinct,
 								bool isready, bool concurrent,
-								bool summarizing, bool withoutoverlaps);
+								bool summarizing, bool withoutoverlaps,
+								Oid *exclusion_ops, Oid *exclusion_procs,
+								uint16 *exclusion_strats);
 
 extern Node *makeStringConst(char *str, int location);
 extern DefElem *makeDefElem(char *name, Node *arg, int location);
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-diff
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename=v36-0003-Move-conversion-of-a-historic-to-MVCC-snapshot-to-a-.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 44+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-27 18:01 [PATCH 2/5] Refactor index_concurrently_create_copy() for use with REPACK (CONCURRENTLY). Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox