agora inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH v25 6/9] Row pattern recognition patch (docs). 37+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH v25 6/9] Row pattern recognition patch (docs). @ 2024-12-21 06:19 Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Tatsuo Ishii @ 2024-12-21 06:19 UTC (permalink / raw) --- doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml | 38 ++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml index 755c9f1485..b0b1d1c51e 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml @@ -537,6 +537,88 @@ WHERE pos < 3; <literal>rank</literal> less than 3. </para> + <para> + Row pattern common syntax can be used to perform row pattern recognition + in a query. The row pattern common syntax includes two sub + clauses: <literal>DEFINE</literal> + and <literal>PATTERN</literal>. <literal>DEFINE</literal> defines + definition variables along with an expression. The expression must be a + logical expression, which means it must + return <literal>TRUE</literal>, <literal>FALSE</literal> + or <literal>NULL</literal>. The expression may comprise column references + and functions. Window functions, aggregate functions and subqueries are + not allowed. An example of <literal>DEFINE</literal> is as follows. + +<programlisting> +DEFINE + LOWPRICE AS price <= 100, + UP AS price > PREV(price), + DOWN AS price < PREV(price) +</programlisting> + + Note that <function>PREV</function> returns the price column in the + previous row if it's called in a context of row pattern recognition. Thus in + the second line the definition variable "UP" is <literal>TRUE</literal> + when the price column in the current row is greater than the price column + in the previous row. Likewise, "DOWN" is <literal>TRUE</literal> when when + the price column in the current row is lower than the price column in the + previous row. + </para> + <para> + Once <literal>DEFINE</literal> exists, <literal>PATTERN</literal> can be + used. <literal>PATTERN</literal> defines a sequence of rows that satisfies + certain conditions. For example following <literal>PATTERN</literal> + defines that a row starts with the condition "LOWPRICE", then one or more + rows satisfy "UP" and finally one or more rows satisfy "DOWN". Note that + "+" means one or more matches. Also you can use "*", which means zero or + more matches. If a sequence of rows which satisfies the PATTERN is found, + in the starting row of the sequence of rows all window functions and + aggregates are shown in the target list. Note that aggregations only look + into the matched rows, rather than whole frame. On the second or + subsequent rows all window functions are NULL. Aggregates are NULL or 0 + (count case) depending on its aggregation definition. For rows that do not + match on the PATTERN, all window functions and aggregates are shown AS + NULL too, except count showing 0. This is because the rows do not match, + thus they are in an empty frame. Example of a <literal>SELECT</literal> + using the <literal>DEFINE</literal> and <literal>PATTERN</literal> clause + is as follows. + +<programlisting> +SELECT company, tdate, price, + first_value(price) OVER w, + max(price) OVER w, + count(price) OVER w +FROM stock + WINDOW w AS ( + PARTITION BY company + ORDER BY tdate + ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING + AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW + INITIAL + PATTERN (LOWPRICE UP+ DOWN+) + DEFINE + LOWPRICE AS price <= 100, + UP AS price > PREV(price), + DOWN AS price < PREV(price) +); +</programlisting> +<screen> + company | tdate | price | first_value | max | count +----------+------------+-------+-------------+-----+------- + company1 | 2023-07-01 | 100 | 100 | 200 | 4 + company1 | 2023-07-02 | 200 | | | 0 + company1 | 2023-07-03 | 150 | | | 0 + company1 | 2023-07-04 | 140 | | | 0 + company1 | 2023-07-05 | 150 | | | 0 + company1 | 2023-07-06 | 90 | 90 | 130 | 4 + company1 | 2023-07-07 | 110 | | | 0 + company1 | 2023-07-08 | 130 | | | 0 + company1 | 2023-07-09 | 120 | | | 0 + company1 | 2023-07-10 | 130 | | | 0 +(10 rows) +</screen> + </para> + <para> When a query involves multiple window functions, it is possible to write out each one with a separate <literal>OVER</literal> clause, but this is diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml index 47370e581a..17a38c4046 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml @@ -23338,6 +23338,7 @@ SELECT count(*) FROM sometable; returns <literal>NULL</literal> if there is no such row. </para></entry> </row> + </tbody> </tgroup> </table> @@ -23377,6 +23378,59 @@ SELECT count(*) FROM sometable; Other frame specifications can be used to obtain other effects. </para> + <para> + Row pattern recognition navigation functions are listed in + <xref linkend="functions-rpr-navigation-table"/>. These functions + can be used to describe DEFINE clause of Row pattern recognition. + </para> + + <table id="functions-rpr-navigation-table"> + <title>Row Pattern Navigation Functions</title> + <tgroup cols="1"> + <thead> + <row> + <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> + Function + </para> + <para> + Description + </para></entry> + </row> + </thead> + + <tbody> + <row> + <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> + <indexterm> + <primary>prev</primary> + </indexterm> + <function>prev</function> ( <parameter>value</parameter> <type>anyelement</type> ) + <returnvalue>anyelement</returnvalue> + </para> + <para> + Returns the column value at the previous row; + returns NULL if there is no previous row in the window frame. + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> + <indexterm> + <primary>next</primary> + </indexterm> + <function>next</function> ( <parameter>value</parameter> <type>anyelement</type> ) + <returnvalue>anyelement</returnvalue> + </para> + <para> + Returns the column value at the next row; + returns NULL if there is no next row in the window frame. + </para></entry> + </row> + + </tbody> + </tgroup> + </table> + <note> <para> The SQL standard defines a <literal>RESPECT NULLS</literal> or diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml index d7089eac0b..7e1c9989ba 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml @@ -969,8 +969,8 @@ WINDOW <replaceable class="parameter">window_name</replaceable> AS ( <replaceabl The <replaceable class="parameter">frame_clause</replaceable> can be one of <synopsis> -{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] -{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } BETWEEN <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> AND <replaceable>frame_end</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] +{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] [row_pattern_common_syntax] +{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } BETWEEN <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> AND <replaceable>frame_end</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] [row_pattern_common_syntax] </synopsis> where <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> @@ -1077,6 +1077,40 @@ EXCLUDE NO OTHERS a given peer group will be in the frame or excluded from it. </para> + <para> + The + optional <replaceable class="parameter">row_pattern_common_syntax</replaceable> + defines the <firstterm>row pattern recognition condition</firstterm> for + this + window. <replaceable class="parameter">row_pattern_common_syntax</replaceable> + includes following subclauses. <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST + ROW</literal> or <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW</literal> controls + how to proceed to next row position after a match + found. With <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW</literal> (the + default) next row position is next to the last row of previous match. On + the other hand, with <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW</literal> next + row position is always next to the last row of previous + match. <literal>DEFINE</literal> defines definition variables along with a + boolean expression. <literal>PATTERN</literal> defines a sequence of rows + that satisfies certain conditions using variables defined + in <literal>DEFINE</literal> clause. If the variable is not defined in + the <literal>DEFINE</literal> clause, it is implicitly assumed + following is defined in the <literal>DEFINE</literal> clause. + +<synopsis> +<literal>variable_name</literal> AS TRUE +</synopsis> + + Note that the maximu number of variables defined + in <literal>DEFINE</literal> clause is 26. + +<synopsis> +[ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW | AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW ] +PATTERN <replaceable class="parameter">pattern_variable_name</replaceable>[+] [, ...] +DEFINE <replaceable class="parameter">definition_varible_name</replaceable> AS <replaceable class="parameter">expression</replaceable> [, ...] +</synopsis> + </para> + <para> The purpose of a <literal>WINDOW</literal> clause is to specify the behavior of <firstterm>window functions</firstterm> appearing in the query's -- 2.25.1 ----Next_Part(Sat_Dec_21_18_20_04_2024_526)-- Content-Type: Text/X-Patch; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="v25-0007-Row-pattern-recognition-patch-tests.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 37+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 37+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-12-21 06:19 [PATCH v25 6/9] Row pattern recognition patch (docs). Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox