[PATCH v2 2/3] Deprecate CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS

agora inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

[PATCH v2 2/3] Deprecate CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS
40+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* [PATCH v2 2/3] Deprecate CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS
@ 2024-05-28 00:19 Erik Wienhold <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Erik Wienhold @ 2024-05-28 00:19 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/parser/gram.y                     | 14 +++++++++++++
 .../expected/test_extensions.out              | 18 +++++++++++++++++
 src/test/regress/expected/matview.out         | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/backend/parser/gram.y b/src/backend/parser/gram.y
index ed477806d1..b1100bdec1 100644
--- a/src/backend/parser/gram.y
+++ b/src/backend/parser/gram.y
@@ -4830,6 +4830,20 @@ CreateMatViewStmt:
 					$8->rel->relpersistence = $2;
 					$8->skipData = !($11);
 					$$ = (Node *) ctas;
+
+					if (ctas->into->rel->schemaname)
+							ereport(WARNING,
+									errmsg("IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation"),
+									errhint("Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW %s.%s.",
+											ctas->into->rel->schemaname,
+											ctas->into->rel->relname),
+									parser_errposition(@1));
+					else
+							ereport(WARNING,
+									errmsg("IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation"),
+									errhint("Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW %s.",
+											ctas->into->rel->relname),
+									parser_errposition(@1));
 				}
 		| CREATE OR REPLACE OptNoLog MATERIALIZED VIEW create_mv_target AS SelectStmt opt_with_data
 				{
diff --git a/src/test/modules/test_extensions/expected/test_extensions.out b/src/test/modules/test_extensions/expected/test_extensions.out
index f357cc21aa..ecd453b29d 100644
--- a/src/test/modules/test_extensions/expected/test_extensions.out
+++ b/src/test/modules/test_extensions/expected/test_extensions.out
@@ -377,41 +377,57 @@ Objects in extension "test_ext_cor"
 CREATE COLLATION ext_cine_coll
   ( LC_COLLATE = "C", LC_CTYPE = "C" );
 CREATE EXTENSION test_ext_cine;  -- fail
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv.
 ERROR:  collation ext_cine_coll is not a member of extension "test_ext_cine"
 DETAIL:  An extension may only use CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS to skip object creation if the conflicting object is one that it already owns.
 DROP COLLATION ext_cine_coll;
 CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv AS SELECT 11 AS f1;
 CREATE EXTENSION test_ext_cine;  -- fail
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv.
 ERROR:  materialized view ext_cine_mv is not a member of extension "test_ext_cine"
 DETAIL:  An extension may only use CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS to skip object creation if the conflicting object is one that it already owns.
 DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv;
 CREATE FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER dummy;
 CREATE SERVER ext_cine_srv FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER dummy;
 CREATE EXTENSION test_ext_cine;  -- fail
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv.
 ERROR:  server ext_cine_srv is not a member of extension "test_ext_cine"
 DETAIL:  An extension may only use CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS to skip object creation if the conflicting object is one that it already owns.
 DROP SERVER ext_cine_srv;
 CREATE SCHEMA ext_cine_schema;
 CREATE EXTENSION test_ext_cine;  -- fail
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv.
 ERROR:  schema ext_cine_schema is not a member of extension "test_ext_cine"
 DETAIL:  An extension may only use CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS to skip object creation if the conflicting object is one that it already owns.
 DROP SCHEMA ext_cine_schema;
 CREATE SEQUENCE ext_cine_seq;
 CREATE EXTENSION test_ext_cine;  -- fail
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv.
 ERROR:  sequence ext_cine_seq is not a member of extension "test_ext_cine"
 DETAIL:  An extension may only use CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS to skip object creation if the conflicting object is one that it already owns.
 DROP SEQUENCE ext_cine_seq;
 CREATE TABLE ext_cine_tab1 (x int);
 CREATE EXTENSION test_ext_cine;  -- fail
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv.
 ERROR:  table ext_cine_tab1 is not a member of extension "test_ext_cine"
 DETAIL:  An extension may only use CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS to skip object creation if the conflicting object is one that it already owns.
 DROP TABLE ext_cine_tab1;
 CREATE TABLE ext_cine_tab2 AS SELECT 42 AS y;
 CREATE EXTENSION test_ext_cine;  -- fail
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv.
 ERROR:  table ext_cine_tab2 is not a member of extension "test_ext_cine"
 DETAIL:  An extension may only use CREATE ... IF NOT EXISTS to skip object creation if the conflicting object is one that it already owns.
 DROP TABLE ext_cine_tab2;
 CREATE EXTENSION test_ext_cine;
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv.
 \dx+ test_ext_cine
 Objects in extension "test_ext_cine"
         Object description         
@@ -433,6 +449,8 @@ Objects in extension "test_ext_cine"
 (14 rows)
 
 ALTER EXTENSION test_ext_cine UPDATE TO '1.1';
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW ext_cine_mv.
 \dx+ test_ext_cine
 Objects in extension "test_ext_cine"
         Object description         
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/matview.out b/src/test/regress/expected/matview.out
index e2e2a13396..cefd0d442c 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/matview.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/matview.out
@@ -565,6 +565,10 @@ CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mvtest_mv_foo AS SELECT * FROM mvtest_foo_data;
 CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mvtest_mv_foo AS SELECT * FROM mvtest_foo_data;
 ERROR:  relation "mvtest_mv_foo" already exists
 CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS mvtest_mv_foo AS SELECT * FROM mvtest_foo_data;
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+LINE 1: CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS mvtest_mv_foo AS SELE...
+        ^
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW mvtest_mv_foo.
 NOTICE:  relation "mvtest_mv_foo" already exists, skipping
 CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON mvtest_mv_foo (i);
 RESET ROLE;
@@ -662,12 +666,20 @@ CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW matview_ine_tab AS SELECT 1 / 0; -- error
 ERROR:  relation "matview_ine_tab" already exists
 CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS matview_ine_tab AS
   SELECT 1 / 0; -- ok
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+LINE 1: CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS matview_ine_tab AS
+        ^
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW matview_ine_tab.
 NOTICE:  relation "matview_ine_tab" already exists, skipping
 CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW matview_ine_tab AS
   SELECT 1 / 0 WITH NO DATA; -- error
 ERROR:  relation "matview_ine_tab" already exists
 CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS matview_ine_tab AS
   SELECT 1 / 0 WITH NO DATA; -- ok
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+LINE 1: CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS matview_ine_tab AS
+        ^
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW matview_ine_tab.
 NOTICE:  relation "matview_ine_tab" already exists, skipping
 EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, COSTS OFF, SUMMARY OFF, TIMING OFF)
   CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW matview_ine_tab AS
@@ -676,6 +688,10 @@ ERROR:  relation "matview_ine_tab" already exists
 EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, COSTS OFF, SUMMARY OFF, TIMING OFF)
   CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS matview_ine_tab AS
     SELECT 1 / 0; -- ok
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+LINE 2:   CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS matview_ine_tab AS
+          ^
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW matview_ine_tab.
 NOTICE:  relation "matview_ine_tab" already exists, skipping
  QUERY PLAN 
 ------------
@@ -688,6 +704,10 @@ ERROR:  relation "matview_ine_tab" already exists
 EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, COSTS OFF, SUMMARY OFF, TIMING OFF)
   CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS matview_ine_tab AS
     SELECT 1 / 0 WITH NO DATA; -- ok
+WARNING:  IF NOT EXISTS is deprecated in materialized view creation
+LINE 2:   CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS matview_ine_tab AS
+          ^
+HINT:  Use CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW matview_ine_tab.
 NOTICE:  relation "matview_ine_tab" already exists, skipping
  QUERY PLAN 
 ------------
-- 
2.45.2


--nrp556lrhtfteavd
Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="v2-0003-Replace-matview-WITH-OLD-DATA.patch"



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 40+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 40+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-28 00:19 [PATCH v2 2/3] Deprecate CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW IF NOT EXISTS Erik Wienhold <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox