agora inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

[PATCH 2/4] Refactor index_concurrently_create_copy() for use with REPACK (CONCURRENTLY).
95+ messages / 1 participants
[nested] [flat]

* [PATCH 2/4] Refactor index_concurrently_create_copy() for use with REPACK (CONCURRENTLY).
@ 2026-03-02 14:30 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-03-02 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)

This patch moves the code to index_create_copy() and adds a "concurrently"
parameter so it can be used by REPACK (CONCURRENTLY).

With the CONCURRENTLY option, REPACK cannot simply swap the heap file and
rebuild its indexes. Instead, it needs to build a separate set of indexes
(including system catalog entries) *before* the actual swap, to reduce the
time AccessExclusiveLock needs to be held for.
---
 src/backend/catalog/index.c      | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c |  6 ++--
 src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c    |  9 +++---
 src/include/catalog/index.h      |  3 ++
 src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h    |  4 ++-
 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
index 5ee6389d39c..f8e6c3d804e 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
@@ -1288,15 +1288,32 @@ index_create(Relation heapRelation,
 /*
  * index_concurrently_create_copy
  *
- * Create concurrently an index based on the definition of the one provided by
- * caller.  The index is inserted into catalogs and needs to be built later
- * on.  This is called during concurrent reindex processing.
- *
- * "tablespaceOid" is the tablespace to use for this index.
+ * Variant of index_create_copy(), called during concurrent reindex
+ * processing.
  */
 Oid
 index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 							   Oid tablespaceOid, const char *newName)
+{
+	return index_create_copy(heapRelation, oldIndexId, tablespaceOid, newName,
+							 true);
+}
+
+/*
+ * index_create_copy
+ *
+ * Create an index based on the definition of the one provided by caller.  The
+ * index is inserted into catalogs. If 'concurrently' is TRUE, it needs to be
+ * built later on, otherwise it's built immediately.
+ *
+ * "tablespaceOid" is the tablespace to use for this index.
+ *
+ * The actual implementation of index_concurrently_create_copy(), reusable for
+ * other purposes.
+ */
+Oid
+index_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId, Oid tablespaceOid,
+				  const char *newName, bool concurrently)
 {
 	Relation	indexRelation;
 	IndexInfo  *oldInfo,
@@ -1315,6 +1332,7 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 	List	   *indexColNames = NIL;
 	List	   *indexExprs = NIL;
 	List	   *indexPreds = NIL;
+	int			flags = 0;
 
 	indexRelation = index_open(oldIndexId, RowExclusiveLock);
 
@@ -1325,7 +1343,7 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 	 * Concurrent build of an index with exclusion constraints is not
 	 * supported.
 	 */
-	if (oldInfo->ii_ExclusionOps != NULL)
+	if (oldInfo->ii_ExclusionOps != NULL && concurrently)
 		ereport(ERROR,
 				(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
 				 errmsg("concurrent index creation for exclusion constraints is not supported")));
@@ -1381,9 +1399,7 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Build the index information for the new index.  Note that rebuild of
-	 * indexes with exclusion constraints is not supported, hence there is no
-	 * need to fill all the ii_Exclusion* fields.
+	 * Build the index information for the new index.
 	 */
 	newInfo = makeIndexInfo(oldInfo->ii_NumIndexAttrs,
 							oldInfo->ii_NumIndexKeyAttrs,
@@ -1392,10 +1408,13 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 							indexPreds,
 							oldInfo->ii_Unique,
 							oldInfo->ii_NullsNotDistinct,
-							false,	/* not ready for inserts */
-							true,
+							!concurrently,	/* isready */
+							concurrently,	/* concurrent */
 							indexRelation->rd_indam->amsummarizing,
-							oldInfo->ii_WithoutOverlaps);
+							oldInfo->ii_WithoutOverlaps,
+							oldInfo->ii_ExclusionOps,
+							oldInfo->ii_ExclusionProcs,
+							oldInfo->ii_ExclusionStrats);
 
 	/*
 	 * Extract the list of column names and the column numbers for the new
@@ -1433,6 +1452,9 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 		stattargets[i].isnull = isnull;
 	}
 
+	if (concurrently)
+		flags = INDEX_CREATE_SKIP_BUILD | INDEX_CREATE_CONCURRENT;
+
 	/*
 	 * Now create the new index.
 	 *
@@ -1456,7 +1478,7 @@ index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
 							  indcoloptions->values,
 							  stattargets,
 							  reloptionsDatum,
-							  INDEX_CREATE_SKIP_BUILD | INDEX_CREATE_CONCURRENT,
+							  flags,
 							  0,
 							  true, /* allow table to be a system catalog? */
 							  false,	/* is_internal? */
@@ -2450,7 +2472,8 @@ BuildIndexInfo(Relation index)
 					   indexStruct->indisready,
 					   false,
 					   index->rd_indam->amsummarizing,
-					   indexStruct->indisexclusion && indexStruct->indisunique);
+					   indexStruct->indisexclusion && indexStruct->indisunique,
+					   NULL, NULL, NULL);
 
 	/* fill in attribute numbers */
 	for (i = 0; i < numAtts; i++)
@@ -2510,7 +2533,8 @@ BuildDummyIndexInfo(Relation index)
 					   indexStruct->indisready,
 					   false,
 					   index->rd_indam->amsummarizing,
-					   indexStruct->indisexclusion && indexStruct->indisunique);
+					   indexStruct->indisexclusion && indexStruct->indisunique,
+					   NULL, NULL, NULL);
 
 	/* fill in attribute numbers */
 	for (i = 0; i < numAtts; i++)
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
index 635679cc1f2..34209bd1393 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c
@@ -243,7 +243,8 @@ CheckIndexCompatible(Oid oldId,
 	 */
 	indexInfo = makeIndexInfo(numberOfAttributes, numberOfAttributes,
 							  accessMethodId, NIL, NIL, false, false,
-							  false, false, amsummarizing, isWithoutOverlaps);
+							  false, false, amsummarizing, isWithoutOverlaps,
+							  NULL, NULL, NULL);
 	typeIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
 	collationIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
 	opclassIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
@@ -930,7 +931,8 @@ DefineIndex(ParseState *pstate,
 							  !concurrent,
 							  concurrent,
 							  amissummarizing,
-							  stmt->iswithoutoverlaps);
+							  stmt->iswithoutoverlaps,
+							  NULL, NULL, NULL);
 
 	typeIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
 	collationIds = palloc_array(Oid, numberOfAttributes);
diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c
index 2caec621d73..ca7e21e8349 100644
--- a/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c
@@ -834,7 +834,8 @@ IndexInfo *
 makeIndexInfo(int numattrs, int numkeyattrs, Oid amoid, List *expressions,
 			  List *predicates, bool unique, bool nulls_not_distinct,
 			  bool isready, bool concurrent, bool summarizing,
-			  bool withoutoverlaps)
+			  bool withoutoverlaps, Oid *exclusion_ops, Oid *exclusion_procs,
+			  uint16 *exclusion_strats)
 {
 	IndexInfo  *n = makeNode(IndexInfo);
 
@@ -863,9 +864,9 @@ makeIndexInfo(int numattrs, int numkeyattrs, Oid amoid, List *expressions,
 	n->ii_PredicateState = NULL;
 
 	/* exclusion constraints */
-	n->ii_ExclusionOps = NULL;
-	n->ii_ExclusionProcs = NULL;
-	n->ii_ExclusionStrats = NULL;
+	n->ii_ExclusionOps = exclusion_ops;
+	n->ii_ExclusionProcs = exclusion_procs;
+	n->ii_ExclusionStrats = exclusion_strats;
 
 	/* speculative inserts */
 	n->ii_UniqueOps = NULL;
diff --git a/src/include/catalog/index.h b/src/include/catalog/index.h
index b259c4141ed..3426087b445 100644
--- a/src/include/catalog/index.h
+++ b/src/include/catalog/index.h
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ extern Oid	index_concurrently_create_copy(Relation heapRelation,
 										   Oid oldIndexId,
 										   Oid tablespaceOid,
 										   const char *newName);
+extern Oid	index_create_copy(Relation heapRelation, Oid oldIndexId,
+							  Oid tablespaceOid, const char *newName,
+							  bool concurrently);
 
 extern void index_concurrently_build(Oid heapRelationId,
 									 Oid indexRelationId);
diff --git a/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h b/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h
index 982ec25ae14..dcea148ae1a 100644
--- a/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h
+++ b/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h
@@ -99,7 +99,9 @@ extern IndexInfo *makeIndexInfo(int numattrs, int numkeyattrs, Oid amoid,
 								List *expressions, List *predicates,
 								bool unique, bool nulls_not_distinct,
 								bool isready, bool concurrent,
-								bool summarizing, bool withoutoverlaps);
+								bool summarizing, bool withoutoverlaps,
+								Oid *exclusion_ops, Oid *exclusion_procs,
+								uint16 *exclusion_strats);
 
 extern Node *makeStringConst(char *str, int location);
 extern DefElem *makeDefElem(char *name, Node *arg, int location);
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename=v37-0003-Add-CONCURRENTLY-option-to-REPACK-command.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 95+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-06 07:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-02 14:30 [PATCH 2/4] Refactor index_concurrently_create_copy() for use with REPACK (CONCURRENTLY). Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox