agora inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

[PATCH v1 3/4] autovac: combine reloptions correctly
97+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* [PATCH v1 3/4] autovac: combine reloptions correctly
@ 2025-06-23 20:16 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2025-06-23 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c b/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c
index 3bedca971ff..0d1f4e38b58 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c
@@ -1873,6 +1873,73 @@ get_database_list(void)
 	return dblist;
 }
 
+static void
+combine_relopts(StdRdOptions *toast_opts, const StdRdOptions *main_opts)
+{
+	AutoVacOpts *toast_avopts = &toast_opts->autovacuum;
+	const AutoVacOpts *main_avopts = &main_opts->autovacuum;
+
+	/* XXX: need isset_offset to combine "enabled" */
+
+	if (toast_avopts->vacuum_threshold == -1)
+		toast_avopts->vacuum_threshold = main_avopts->vacuum_threshold;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->vacuum_max_threshold == -2)
+		toast_avopts->vacuum_max_threshold = main_avopts->vacuum_max_threshold;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->vacuum_ins_threshold == -2)
+		toast_avopts->vacuum_ins_threshold = main_avopts->vacuum_ins_threshold;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->analyze_threshold == -1)
+		toast_avopts->analyze_threshold = main_avopts->analyze_threshold;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->vacuum_cost_limit == -1)
+		toast_avopts->vacuum_cost_limit = main_avopts->vacuum_cost_limit;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->freeze_min_age == -1)
+		toast_avopts->freeze_min_age = main_avopts->freeze_min_age;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->freeze_max_age == -1)
+		toast_avopts->freeze_max_age = main_avopts->freeze_max_age;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->freeze_table_age == -1)
+		toast_avopts->freeze_table_age = main_avopts->freeze_table_age;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->multixact_freeze_min_age == -1)
+		toast_avopts->multixact_freeze_min_age = main_avopts->multixact_freeze_min_age;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->multixact_freeze_max_age == -1)
+		toast_avopts->multixact_freeze_max_age = main_avopts->multixact_freeze_max_age;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->multixact_freeze_table_age == -1)
+		toast_avopts->multixact_freeze_table_age = main_avopts->multixact_freeze_table_age;
+
+	/* XXX: need isset_offset for log_min_duration */
+
+	if (toast_avopts->vacuum_cost_delay == -1)
+		toast_avopts->vacuum_cost_delay = main_avopts->vacuum_cost_delay;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->vacuum_scale_factor == -1)
+		toast_avopts->vacuum_scale_factor = main_avopts->vacuum_scale_factor;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->vacuum_ins_scale_factor == -1)
+		toast_avopts->vacuum_ins_scale_factor = main_avopts->vacuum_ins_scale_factor;
+
+	if (toast_avopts->analyze_scale_factor == -1)
+		toast_avopts->analyze_scale_factor = main_avopts->analyze_scale_factor;
+
+	/* XXX: need isset_offset for vacuum_index_cleanup */
+
+	if (!toast_opts->vacuum_truncate_set && main_opts->vacuum_truncate_set)
+	{
+		toast_opts->vacuum_truncate = main_opts->vacuum_truncate;
+		toast_opts->vacuum_truncate_set = true;
+	}
+
+	if (toast_opts->vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate == -1)
+		toast_opts->vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate = main_opts->vacuum_max_eager_freeze_failure_rate;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a database table-by-table
  *
@@ -2113,7 +2180,16 @@ do_autovacuum(void)
 		 */
 		relopts = (StdRdOptions *) extractRelOptions(tuple, pg_class_desc, NULL);
 		if (relopts)
+		{
+			av_relation *hentry;
+			bool		found;
+
 			free_relopts = true;
+
+			hentry = hash_search(table_toast_map, &relid, HASH_FIND, &found);
+			if (found && hentry->ar_hasrelopts)
+				combine_relopts(relopts, &hentry->ar_reloptions);
+		}
 		else
 		{
 			av_relation *hentry;
@@ -2733,7 +2809,16 @@ table_recheck_autovac(Oid relid, HTAB *table_toast_map,
 	 */
 	relopts = (StdRdOptions *) extractRelOptions(classTup, pg_class_desc, NULL);
 	if (relopts)
+	{
+		av_relation *hentry;
+		bool		found;
+
 		free_relopts = true;
+
+		hentry = hash_search(table_toast_map, &relid, HASH_FIND, &found);
+		if (found && hentry->ar_hasrelopts)
+			combine_relopts(relopts, &hentry->ar_reloptions);
+	}
 	else if (classForm->relkind == RELKIND_TOASTVALUE &&
 			 table_toast_map != NULL)
 	{
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)


--QWBYbd5Ar5k8NvSv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=v1-0004-combine-relopts-correctly-for-VACUUM-commands.patch



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--tbdehtstrqwksfdh--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used.
@ 2026-05-06 07:38 Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 97+ messages in thread

From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-05-06 07:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

Currently, decoding session that relies on database-specific xl_running_xacts
WAL records can also use some information of cluster-wide records and vice
versa. Although this approach might reduce the total number of
xl_running_xacts records, it's simply not correct.

SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts() now decides at the very beginning whether
particular record can be used or not.
---
 src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c | 55 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
index c8309b96ed4..b9661b7d70a 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,39 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	ReorderBufferTXN *txn;
 	TransactionId xmin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Each decoding session should use either cluster-wide snapshots or
+	 * database-specific ones, but not both. Since the latter can have more
+	 * recent value of oldestRunningXid, builder->xmin could go backwards if
+	 * it was followed by cluster-wide snapshot - see the ->xmin adjustment
+	 * below.
+	 */
+	if (!db_specific && OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		return;
+
+	if (db_specific)
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Make sure that we have the snapshots needed for startup, as well as
+		 * those for regular cleanup: each time the cluster-wide snapshot is
+		 * created (typically on slot creation or by checkpointer), the
+		 * database-specific snapshot is requested here if the current session
+		 * needs it.
+		 */
+		if (!OidIsValid(running->dbid))
+		{
+			LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
+
+			return;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Snapshots issued for other databases do not contain the information
+		 * about transactions in our database.
+		 */
+		else if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
+			return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * If we're not consistent yet, inspect the record to see whether it
 	 * allows to get closer to being consistent. If we are consistent, dump
@@ -1171,17 +1204,7 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 		 */
 		if (db_specific)
 		{
-			/*
-			 * If we must only keep track of transactions running in the
-			 * current database, we need transaction info from exactly that
-			 * database.
-			 */
-			if (running->dbid != MyDatabaseId)
-			{
-				LogStandbySnapshot(MyDatabaseId);
-
-				return;
-			}
+			Assert(running->dbid == MyDatabaseId);
 
 			/*
 			 * We'd better be able to check during scan if the plugin does not
@@ -1198,16 +1221,6 @@ SnapBuildProcessRunningXacts(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn, xl_running_xact
 	else
 		SnapBuildSerialize(builder, lsn);
 
-	/*
-	 * Database specific transaction info may exist to reach CONSISTENT state
-	 * faster, however the code below makes no use of it. Moreover, such
-	 * record might cause problems because the following normal (cluster-wide)
-	 * record can have lower value of oldestRunningXid. In that case, let's
-	 * wait with the cleanup for the next regular cluster-wide record.
-	 */
-	if (OidIsValid(running->dbid))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Update range of interesting xids based on the running xacts
 	 * information. We don't increase ->xmax using it, because once we are in
-- 
2.47.3


--=-=-=--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 97+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-06 07:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-23 20:16 [PATCH v1 3/4] autovac: combine reloptions correctly Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH 3/3] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
2026-05-06 07:38 [PATCH] Distinguish properly when database-specific transaction list should be used. Antonin Houska <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox