[PATCH v6 1/2] Clear padding in PgStat

agora inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

[PATCH v6 1/2] Clear padding in PgStat_HashKey keys
209+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* [PATCH v6 1/2] Clear padding in PgStat_HashKey keys
@ 2024-11-02 14:21 Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Bertrand Drouvot @ 2024-11-02 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)

PgStat_HashKey keys are currently initialized in a way that could result in random
data in the padding bytes (if there was padding in PgStat_HashKey which is not
the case currently).

We are using sizeof(PgStat_HashKey) in pgstat_cmp_hash_key() and we compute the
hash hash key in pgstat_hash_hash_key() using the PgStat_HashKey struct size as
input. So, we have to ensure that no random data can be stored in the padding
bytes (if any) of a PgStat_HashKey key.
---
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat.c       |  3 +++
 src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_shmem.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 100.0% src/backend/utils/activity/

diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat.c
index be48432cc3..ea8c5691e8 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat.c
@@ -938,6 +938,9 @@ pgstat_fetch_entry(PgStat_Kind kind, Oid dboid, uint64 objid)
 
 	pgstat_prep_snapshot();
 
+	/* clear padding */
+	memset(&key, 0, sizeof(struct PgStat_HashKey));
+
 	key.kind = kind;
 	key.dboid = dboid;
 	key.objid = objid;
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_shmem.c b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_shmem.c
index a09c6fee05..c1b7ff76b1 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_shmem.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/activity/pgstat_shmem.c
@@ -432,11 +432,18 @@ PgStat_EntryRef *
 pgstat_get_entry_ref(PgStat_Kind kind, Oid dboid, uint64 objid, bool create,
 					 bool *created_entry)
 {
-	PgStat_HashKey key = {.kind = kind,.dboid = dboid,.objid = objid};
+	PgStat_HashKey key;
 	PgStatShared_HashEntry *shhashent;
 	PgStatShared_Common *shheader = NULL;
 	PgStat_EntryRef *entry_ref;
 
+	/* clear padding */
+	memset(&key, 0, sizeof(struct PgStat_HashKey));
+
+	key.kind = kind;
+	key.dboid = dboid;
+	key.objid = objid;
+
 	/*
 	 * passing in created_entry only makes sense if we possibly could create
 	 * entry.
@@ -908,10 +915,17 @@ pgstat_drop_database_and_contents(Oid dboid)
 bool
 pgstat_drop_entry(PgStat_Kind kind, Oid dboid, uint64 objid)
 {
-	PgStat_HashKey key = {.kind = kind,.dboid = dboid,.objid = objid};
+	PgStat_HashKey key;
 	PgStatShared_HashEntry *shent;
 	bool		freed = true;
 
+	/* clear padding */
+	memset(&key, 0, sizeof(struct PgStat_HashKey));
+
+	key.kind = kind;
+	key.dboid = dboid;
+	key.objid = objid;
+
 	/* delete local reference */
 	if (pgStatEntryRefHash)
 	{
-- 
2.34.1


--gvmrl0mfoTEJEfPE
Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="v6-0002-Provide-relfilenode-statistics.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics
@ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 209+ messages in thread

From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
 #include "miscadmin.h"
 #include "pg_trace.h"
 #include "pgstat.h"
+#include "port/atomics.h"
 #include "storage/lmgr.h"
 #include "storage/proc.h"
 #include "storage/procarray.h"
 #include "storage/shmem.h"
-#include "storage/spin.h"
 #include "storage/standby.h"
 #include "storage/subsystems.h"
 #include "utils/memutils.h"
@@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock);
 #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \
 	((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS)
 
-typedef struct
-{
-	slock_t		mutex;
-	uint32		count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS];
-} FastPathStrongRelationLockData;
-
-static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
+static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks;
 
 static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg);
 static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg);
@@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 		);
 
 	ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data",
-					   .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData),
+					   .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32),
+										FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS),
 					   .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks,
 		);
 }
@@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg)
 static void
 LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg)
 {
-	SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+	for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++)
+		pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag,
 			/*
 			 * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe
 			 * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to
-			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we
-			 * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
+			 * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it
+			 * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks.
 			 */
 			LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
-			if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0)
+			if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0)
 				acquired = false;
 			else
 				acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2,
@@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
 
 		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 		locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 	}
 
 	if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash,
@@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode)
 	Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false);
 
-	/*
-	 * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to
-	 * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at
-	 * the same time.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add
-	 * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported.
-	 */
-
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
+	pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true;
 	StrongLockInProgress = locallock;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void)
 
 	fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode);
 	Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true);
-	SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-	Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-	FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
+	Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+	pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false;
 	StrongLockInProgress = NULL;
-	SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info,
 	{
 		uint32		fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode);
 
-		SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
-		FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++;
-		SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex);
+		pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1);
 	}
 
 	LWLockRelease(partitionLock);
-- 
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)


--Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO--






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 209+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 209+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-02 14:21 [PATCH v6 1/2] Clear padding in PgStat_HashKey keys Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox