agora inbox for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orghelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH v28 02/11] Add relisivm column to pg_class system catalog 761+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH v28 02/11] Add relisivm column to pg_class system catalog @ 2019-12-20 01:07 Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Yugo Nagata @ 2019-12-20 01:07 UTC (permalink / raw) If this boolean column is true, a relations is Incrementally Maintainable Materialized View (IMMV). This is set when IMMV is created. --- src/backend/catalog/heap.c | 1 + src/backend/catalog/index.c | 1 + src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c | 2 ++ src/include/catalog/pg_class.h | 3 +++ src/include/utils/lsyscache.h | 1 + src/include/utils/rel.h | 2 ++ 7 files changed, 34 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/heap.c b/src/backend/catalog/heap.c index 2a0d82aedd..37a7759753 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/heap.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/heap.c @@ -924,6 +924,7 @@ InsertPgClassTuple(Relation pg_class_desc, values[Anum_pg_class_relrewrite - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(rd_rel->relrewrite); values[Anum_pg_class_relfrozenxid - 1] = TransactionIdGetDatum(rd_rel->relfrozenxid); values[Anum_pg_class_relminmxid - 1] = MultiXactIdGetDatum(rd_rel->relminmxid); + values[Anum_pg_class_relisivm - 1] = BoolGetDatum(rd_rel->relisivm); if (relacl != (Datum) 0) values[Anum_pg_class_relacl - 1] = relacl; else diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c index 352e43d0e6..f715cf31ac 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c @@ -994,6 +994,7 @@ index_create(Relation heapRelation, indexRelation->rd_rel->relowner = heapRelation->rd_rel->relowner; indexRelation->rd_rel->relam = accessMethodObjectId; indexRelation->rd_rel->relispartition = OidIsValid(parentIndexRelid); + indexRelation->rd_rel->relisivm = false; /* * store index's pg_class entry diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c index 60978f9415..c3bf9aeac6 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c @@ -2024,6 +2024,30 @@ get_rel_relispartition(Oid relid) return false; } +/* + * get_rel_relisivm + * + * Returns the relisivm flag associated with a given relation. + */ +bool +get_rel_relisivm(Oid relid) +{ + HeapTuple tp; + + tp = SearchSysCache1(RELOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(relid)); + if (HeapTupleIsValid(tp)) + { + Form_pg_class reltup = (Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(tp); + bool result; + + result = reltup->relisivm; + ReleaseSysCache(tp); + return result; + } + else + return false; +} + /* * get_rel_tablespace * diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c index 8a08463c2b..1ba5c3c883 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c @@ -1924,6 +1924,8 @@ formrdesc(const char *relationName, Oid relationReltype, /* ... and they're always populated, too */ relation->rd_rel->relispopulated = true; + /* ... and they're always no ivm, too */ + relation->rd_rel->relisivm = false; relation->rd_rel->relreplident = REPLICA_IDENTITY_NOTHING; relation->rd_rel->relpages = 0; diff --git a/src/include/catalog/pg_class.h b/src/include/catalog/pg_class.h index 2d1bb7af3a..62b9c0e5cb 100644 --- a/src/include/catalog/pg_class.h +++ b/src/include/catalog/pg_class.h @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ CATALOG(pg_class,1259,RelationRelationId) BKI_BOOTSTRAP BKI_ROWTYPE_OID(83,Relat /* is relation a partition? */ bool relispartition BKI_DEFAULT(f); + /* is relation a matview with ivm? */ + bool relisivm BKI_DEFAULT(f); + /* link to original rel during table rewrite; otherwise 0 */ Oid relrewrite BKI_DEFAULT(0) BKI_LOOKUP_OPT(pg_class); diff --git a/src/include/utils/lsyscache.h b/src/include/utils/lsyscache.h index 4f5418b972..078cdf963b 100644 --- a/src/include/utils/lsyscache.h +++ b/src/include/utils/lsyscache.h @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ extern Oid get_rel_namespace(Oid relid); extern Oid get_rel_type_id(Oid relid); extern char get_rel_relkind(Oid relid); extern bool get_rel_relispartition(Oid relid); +extern bool get_rel_relisivm(Oid relid); extern Oid get_rel_tablespace(Oid relid); extern char get_rel_persistence(Oid relid); extern Oid get_transform_fromsql(Oid typid, Oid langid, List *trftypes); diff --git a/src/include/utils/rel.h b/src/include/utils/rel.h index 1426a353cd..b8961176bb 100644 --- a/src/include/utils/rel.h +++ b/src/include/utils/rel.h @@ -677,6 +677,8 @@ RelationCloseSmgr(Relation relation) */ #define RelationIsPopulated(relation) ((relation)->rd_rel->relispopulated) +#define RelationIsIVM(relation) ((relation)->rd_rel->relisivm) + /* * RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding * True if we need to log enough information to have access via -- 2.25.1 --Multipart=_Thu__1_Jun_2023_23_59_09_+0900_/G5+8nG46.f1T42K Content-Type: text/x-diff; name="v28-0003-Allow-to-prolong-life-span-of-transition-tables-.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="v28-0003-Allow-to-prolong-life-span-of-transition-tables-.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++---------------------- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 0608eee9eb2..c5943d7fc74 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3364,10 +3345,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4502,9 +4481,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 56c1f997f88..f4c989c8c30 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -846,7 +846,6 @@ FSMPageData FakeRelCacheEntry FakeRelCacheEntryData FastPathMeta -FastPathStrongRelationLockData FdwInfo FdwRoutine FetchDirection -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Xf36GNcW+0xZNily-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics @ 2026-07-09 20:38 Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 761+ messages in thread From: Nathan Bossart @ 2026-07-09 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c | 57 ++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c index 5ee80c7632e..035932197a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "pg_trace.h" #include "pgstat.h" +#include "port/atomics.h" #include "storage/lmgr.h" #include "storage/proc.h" #include "storage/procarray.h" #include "storage/shmem.h" -#include "storage/spin.h" #include "storage/standby.h" #include "storage/subsystems.h" #include "utils/memutils.h" @@ -306,13 +306,7 @@ static PROCLOCK *FastPathGetRelationLockEntry(LOCALLOCK *locallock); #define FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode) \ ((hashcode) % FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS) -typedef struct -{ - slock_t mutex; - uint32 count[FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS]; -} FastPathStrongRelationLockData; - -static FastPathStrongRelationLockData *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; +static pg_atomic_uint32 *FastPathStrongRelationLocks; static void LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg); static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg); @@ -484,7 +478,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) ); ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Fast Path Strong Relation Lock Data", - .size = sizeof(FastPathStrongRelationLockData), + .size = mul_size(sizeof(pg_atomic_uint32), + FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS), .ptr = (void **) (void *) &FastPathStrongRelationLocks, ); } @@ -492,7 +487,8 @@ LockManagerShmemRequest(void *arg) static void LockManagerShmemInit(void *arg) { - SpinLockInit(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + for (int i = 0; i < FAST_PATH_STRONG_LOCK_HASH_PARTITIONS; i++) + pg_atomic_init_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[i], 0); } /* @@ -992,11 +988,11 @@ LockAcquireExtended(const LOCKTAG *locktag, /* * LWLockAcquire acts as a memory sequencing point, so it's safe * to assume that any strong locker whose increment to - * FastPathStrongRelationLocks->counts becomes visible after we - * test it has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. + * FastPathStrongRelationLocks becomes visible after we test it + * has yet to begin to transfer fast-path locks. */ LWLockAcquire(&MyProc->fpInfoLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); - if (FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] != 0) + if (pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) != 0) acquired = false; else acquired = FastPathGrantRelationLock(locktag->locktag_field2, @@ -1501,11 +1497,9 @@ RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } if (!hash_search(LockMethodLocalHash, @@ -1834,20 +1828,9 @@ BeginStrongLockAcquire(LOCALLOCK *locallock, uint32 fasthashcode) Assert(StrongLockInProgress == NULL); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == false); - /* - * Adding to a memory location is not atomic, so we take a spinlock to - * ensure we don't collide with someone else trying to bump the count at - * the same time. - * - * XXX: It might be worth considering using an atomic fetch-and-add - * instruction here, on architectures where that is supported. - */ - - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = true; StrongLockInProgress = locallock; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -1875,12 +1858,10 @@ AbortStrongLockAcquire(void) fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(locallock->hashcode); Assert(locallock->holdsStrongLockCount == true); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); locallock->holdsStrongLockCount = false; StrongLockInProgress = NULL; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); } /* @@ -3365,10 +3346,8 @@ LockRefindAndRelease(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - Assert(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode] > 0); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]--; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + Assert(pg_atomic_read_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode]) > 0); + pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } } @@ -4504,9 +4483,7 @@ lock_twophase_recover(FullTransactionId fxid, uint16 info, { uint32 fasthashcode = FastPathStrongLockHashPartition(hashcode); - SpinLockAcquire(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); - FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]++; - SpinLockRelease(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks->mutex); + pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&FastPathStrongRelationLocks[fasthashcode], 1); } LWLockRelease(partitionLock); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --Ot5x3ffkWEuxilWO-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 761+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-09 20:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 761+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-12-20 01:07 [PATCH v28 02/11] Add relisivm column to pg_class system catalog Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v2 9/9] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org> 2026-07-09 20:38 [PATCH v1 8/8] convert FastPathStrongRelationLocks to atomics Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox