public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: =?utf-8?B?Y2NhNTUwNw==?= <[email protected]>
To: =?utf-8?B?emVuZ21hbg==?= <[email protected]>
To: =?utf-8?B?Sm9obiBOYXlsb3I=?= <[email protected]>
Cc: =?utf-8?B?cGdzcWwtaGFja2Vycw==?= <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: tuple radix sort
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 19:46:56 +0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CANWCAZYzx7a7E9AY16Jt_U3+GVKDADfgApZ-42SYNiig8dTnFA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANWCAZbsx5VY-F5RVvZ5H1abBWcinMY90gNra6EbdGS1CTx=7g@mail.gmail.com>
<CANWCAZaN8kW6o7Ymc_jzPO_Z5SqekQTTNra3xTGYTH+cjrVp8g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CANWCAZZiMGj6QuHfyBPv9at7xn23NPAz4nit=G6fr26V+h8MKg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CANWCAZaKRzsYPn9YWRR8g5dkX-ep_jgyUb4r3KFekK5ZTNo7ew@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CANWCAZaBeDPfF0sCdSssRXv6nBZeRP8Z=OO1731zsoUC58U5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CANWCAZZo5rgE4+NYYES1hLN9PvonXMH=K3Z7b0TKcCBNOAjaag@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CANWCAZYur4VDbx9zkpFM3mM4-Hj4_Vt1t=Z4TPhK7+3=T6BMOA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CANWCAZYBgHCpS-w5E8+wJpfhwLK88Kys-5ukSta2gj4BRPiTSg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
Hi,
> I'm wondering if we should replace `state->memtuples` with `data` in the `sort_byvalue_datum()` function here.
+1. Now data == state->memtuples, how about remove the parameter "data" and "n" and just
get them from "Tuplesortstate"?
Some comments for v7:
1)
```
/*
* Retrieve byte from datum, indexed by 'level': 0 for LSB, 7 for MSB
*/
static inline uint8
current_byte(Datum key, int level)
{
int shift = (SIZEOF_DATUM - 1 - level) * BITS_PER_BYTE;
return (key >> shift) & 0xFF;
}
```
Maybe "0 for MSB, 7 for LSB"? If level == 0, this function will return the Most Significant Byte.
2) radix_sort_tuple()
```
size_t end_offset = partitions[*rp].next_offset;
SortTuple *partition_end = begin + end_offset;
ptrdiff_t num_elements = end_offset - start_offset;
```
Why the type of "num_elements" is "ptrdiff_t"? Maybe just "size_t"?
3) tuplesort_sort_memtuples()
```
/*
* Do we have the leading column's value or abbreviation in datum1?
*/
if (state->base.haveDatum1 && state->base.sortKeys)
{
SortSupportData ssup = state->base.sortKeys[0];
```
I think we should avoid the copy of SortSupportData. We can just use a pointer.
4)
Many places just consider "Datum" as integer, do we need to add a DatumGetUInt**() for them?
--
Regards,
ChangAo Chen
view thread (15+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: tuple radix sort
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox