From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha@edu.sollentuna.se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: The problem between libpq and libpgtcl for WIN32
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 19:12:23 +0900
Message-ID: <000101be274a$3de91060$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000101be24ad$1e2d9b00$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp>
Hi all.
I have changed the subject from "libpq and libpgtcl in Windows".
My main point is
The treatment of pgresStatus[] in libpq must be changed ?
In case of Windows,global data interface between dll's is
different from UNIX.
If fact,libpgtcl references global data pgresStatus[] in libpq
and pg_result -status command does not work properly for
Windows.
I think it is preferable to use function interfaces than gobal
data references.
Any ideas ?
Thanks
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp
PS.
I accepted a lot of mails about libpq and libpgtcl.
Seems many people thought I am good at libpq,Tcl etc.
But my work is only the compilation of libpq and libpgtcl.
LIBPQ for WIN32 is the work of Magnus Hagander.
I changed libpgtcl and libpq just a little for pgaccess.
The dll's I provieded are only for pgaccess not for general use.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: Inoue@tpf.co.jp, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, mha@edu.sollentuna.se, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: The problem between libpq and libpgtcl for WIN32
In-Reply-To: <000101be274a$3de91060$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox