From: Postgres mailing lists <postgres@weblynk.com>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC Query performance
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 11:10:57 -0800
Message-ID: <001001be73ce$8dcde210$64ba01cc@earthlink.net> (raw)
>At 11:07 +0200 on 18/03/1999, Peter Mount wrote:
>
>
>>
>> The delay is because the driver currently retrieves the entire result
>> into a Vector() before returning the ResultSet.
>
>Couldn't it also be because of Java's usage of network sockets compared to
>psql's use of unix sockets?
>
You know, I also noticed that it is the postgres back-end process which is
using all the CPU time during the query. Doesn't sound like Vector
operations to me, which should cause the java process to eat all the CPU
time.
Rich.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: postgres@weblynk.com
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC Query performance
In-Reply-To: <001001be73ce$8dcde210$64ba01cc@earthlink.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox