From: Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
To: 'Jaume Pausas' <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:05:10 -0800
Message-ID: <008501bf6f42$c2bf39e0$0100a8c0@kpi.com.au> (raw)
References: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C15D@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk>
<004001bf6f3f$11a96480$0100a8c0@kpi.com.au>
Hi,
Whats the status/go with stream support for JDBC?
My questions are will the backend allow
it (using JDBC, not native) and would it
be too hard to point the stream support
at the large object API?
i.e. anything that's a setBinaryStream()
or whatnot just serializes the object.
Also, whats involved with getting a
LO reaping mechanism permanently in place?
I'm doing some stuff with Java objects
at the moment and LO reaping and the
stream support strike me as pretty
necessary.
Cheers,
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Shevland" <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
To: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> --
> Any views stated are in the hope that Peter Mount
> moves quickly on the PostgreSQL JDBC driver ;)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
> To: "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649@dis.ulpgc.es>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:14 AM
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> > If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
> > release.
> >
> > ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
> > the moment.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > --
> > Peter Mount
> > Enterprise Support
> > Maidstone Borough Council
> > Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649@dis.ulpgc.es]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
> > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> > Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that some
> > drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
> > interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
> >
> > Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
> >
> >
> >
> > ************
> >
> > ************
> >
>
>
> ************
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: shevlandj@kpi.com.au, petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk, a1649@dis.ulpgc.es
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
In-Reply-To: <008501bf6f42$c2bf39e0$0100a8c0@kpi.com.au>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox