From: Adam Lang <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:43:22 -0500
Message-ID: <00fd01c08165$8369c180$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006> (raw)
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101180951450.548-100000@thelab.hub.org>
Who actually types their email addresses? Use an address book. ;)
psql-odbc should be fine though.
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
>
> okay, so far, its all been positive feedback on this, so I'm going to go
> ahead with it ... with one slight change ...
>
> when we did the php list, I did it as:
>
> pgsql-php@postgresql.org -and- comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.php
>
> that way, for email purposes, the address was shorter, less to type in ...
>
> I'd like to do the same with the jdbc and odbc lists, unless anyone has an
> objection to typing 11 characters less in an email address? :)
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
>
> > I agree also... I don't do C programming, so a huge chunk of the list
info I
> > scan and delete. Sounds logical.
> >
> > Adam Lang
> > Systems Engineer
> > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Oscar Serrano" <oserra@fondos.net>
> > To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:02 AM
> > Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > > De: pgsql-interfaces-owner@postgresql.org
> > > > [mailto:pgsql-interfaces-owner@postgresql.org]En nombre de Dave Page
> > > > Enviado el: jueves, 18 de enero de 2001 9:06
> > > > Para: 'The Hermit Hacker'; pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > > > Asunto: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list
...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy@hub.org]
> > > > > Sent: 18 January 2001 03:26
> > > > > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > > > > Subject: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > After some discussions with various members of the project, it was
> > > > > suggested that an RFC be sent out to the -interfaces list asking
for
> > > > > opinions ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Due to the growing volume on these lists, primarily around
> > > > > the ODBC and
> > > > > JDBC drivers, I'm proposing that a split to this list be
> > > > > made, so that we
> > > > > have:
> > >
> > >
> > > I completly agree. I'm not interested in JDBC nor ODBC.
> > > thank you.
> > >
> > > Oscar Serrano.
> >
> >
>
> Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick:
Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary:
scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: aalang@rutgersinsurance.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
In-Reply-To: <00fd01c08165$8369c180$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox