From: Adam Lang <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Connecting remotely.
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 11:40:18 -0500
Message-ID: <016401c04422$6b8db600$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006> (raw)
References: <SAK.2000.11.01.bcgmfmgqsjqscnak@a.b.c>
What's the difference between having the client use ADO to talk to the
database as opposed to an interface using the postgresql client libraries?
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergio A. Kessler" <sak@tribctas.gba.gov.ar>
To: <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely.
> "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com> el día Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:52:35
> -0500, escribió:
>
> [...]
> >
> >What are people's thoughts?
>
> people's thoughts are that you really want to design a multi-thier
> design (for example a 3 layer design), where
>
> / client1 (browser)
> database <---> bussines rules - client2 (browser)
> (ie. apache, php,...) \ .....
>
>
> if your client has direct access to the database, you design is broken...
>
> sergio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: aalang@rutgersinsurance.com
Subject: Re: Connecting remotely.
In-Reply-To: <016401c04422$6b8db600$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox