From: David Wall <d.wall@computer.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Vacuum analyze in 7.1.1
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:01:08 -0700
Message-ID: <016901c0f486$a6372240$5a2b7ad8@expertrade.com> (raw)
References: <00c401c0f43b$a5423000$5a2b7ad8@expertrade.com>
<3101.992468005@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<006501c0f45b$eca1c580$5a2b7ad8@expertrade.com>
<15660.992481431@sss.pgh.pa.us>
The new vacuum comments are much more clear. Bravo.
As for the large objects, I'll have to see what happens when I delete a row
that contains a large object. Sounds like they are not being deleted for me
as I had thought. That's too bad since I know it must be a common problem
for those who use them. I use the JDBC library, so I don't really even
create the large objects except through standard JDBC calls like
PreparedStatement.setBytes(). I'll have to see if JDBC does an unlink
anywhere.
David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: d.wall@computer.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Vacuum analyze in 7.1.1
In-Reply-To: <016901c0f486$a6372240$5a2b7ad8@expertrade.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox