From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: 17 Mar 2003 22:40:18 -0500
Message-ID: <1047958818.19380.13.camel@tokyo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13207.1047952121@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303172059170.1975-100000@peter.localdomain>
<13207.1047952121@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 20:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > If we do this, could we get rid of the messy autocommit GUC option and
> > handle autocommit in the client?
>
> Hmm ... that's a thought ... not very backwards-compatible with 7.3,
> but I think I like it better than continuing on with the GUC option.
> As you say, that path is looking messier all the time.
Yes, definitely -- replacing the 7.3 GUC option would be great, that's a
pretty bad hack IMHO.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: neilc@samurai.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
In-Reply-To: <1047958818.19380.13.camel@tokyo>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox