From: Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: qualified column names
Date: 17 Apr 2003 11:19:26 -0400
Message-ID: <1050592766.6918.33.camel@inspiron.cramers> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304151046520.1750-100000@peter.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304151046520.1750-100000@peter.localdomain>
I didn't get a reply to this, I'm wondering if it just slipped through the cracks?
jdbc and I suspect odbc have a requirement to return the table, and
schema of a column in a result set.
for jdbc at least a possible solution is to return
schema.table.column for each column returned. This could be turned
off/on using GUC variable.
functions, and computed fields can just return the column name as they
don't belong to a schema or table.
Does anyone have any other requirments?
--
Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>
Cramer Consulting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: dave@fastcrypt.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: qualified column names
In-Reply-To: <1050592766.6918.33.camel@inspiron.cramers>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox