pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] libpq + multiple connections ...
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 02:45:12 -0500
Message-ID: <13255.943861512@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9911290300471.68617-100000@thelab.hub.org>

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> forwards:
> Hmm, sorta, I'm a bit troubled, I was trying to add an async connection
> function to libpq and I stumbled across some problems.

Someone else was already working on that --- check the archives from
a few months back.

> It seems that libpq makes use of some static variables, meaning i'm not
> sure if it's safe to use libpq for multiple database connections.
> What i'm refering to is:
> postgresql-6.5.3/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
> line 79 has a structure that seems to be shared amongst the entire
> library, am I likely to stumble upon more stuff that makes it somewhat
> dangerous to have more than one active database connection in my program?

The PQconnectdb() function uses that static array, meaning that you can't
safely run two PQconnectdb() calls in parallel.  But you can open two
connections in sequence and then use them in parallel; and you can do
the opens in parallel if you use one of the older, less-friendly
connection-opening calls.  There aren't any other non-constant statics
in libpq AFAIR.

The static array sucks, I agree, but I don't see any way to get rid of
it without changing libpq's API for PQconnectdb() and PQconndefaults().
Do we want to consider doing that (and breaking some apps) for 7.0?

			regards, tom lane



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <13255.943861512@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../13255.943861512@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/13255.943861512@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, scrappy@hub.org
  Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] libpq + multiple connections ...
  In-Reply-To: <13255.943861512@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox