From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ...
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 16:43:59 -0500
Message-ID: <17344.976225439@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012072201340.780-100000@peter.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012072201340.780-100000@peter.localdomain>
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Another thing we should think about is to not tar.gz the documentation
> files. That way we could create useful incremental diffs between releases
> later on. Any comments here?
I've never figured out why we do that. Since the thing is going to be
inside a tarball anyway, there's no possible savings from distributing
the built doco that way, rather than as ordinary files.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net, scrappy@hub.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ...
In-Reply-To: <17344.976225439@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox