From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PQprepare question
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:52:55 -0400
Message-ID: <18665.1178891575@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070511134817.GA9188@feivel.credativ.de>
References: <20070511111647.GA18711@feivel.credativ.de>
<17526.1178888881@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20070511134817.GA9188@feivel.credativ.de>
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:08:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's an operator name.
> Ah, didn't notice. But that means that ecpg should not accept "?" as
> placeholder either as this is prone to give errors depending on the
> usage right?
I'd vote that way if you haven't accepted it in the past. Otherwise
you'll need some kind of compromise for backward compatibility ...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, meskes@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PQprepare question
In-Reply-To: <18665.1178891575@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox