pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keke abe <keke@mac.com>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Connecting remotely - multi tier
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 04:03:02 +0900
Message-ID: <19340927123446.8209@mail.gol.com> (raw)

Adam Lang wrote:

> Ok... so if I am writing a distributed application in windows that will use
> a Postgresql backend, I should have the client interface another "server"
> application, which will inturn access/retrieve informaton from the database?

I'd like to know if this kind of layering is mandatory or not. Is it really
unacceptable to expose the Posgresql backend to the rest of the world? Is
there anything that I should be aware of if I let the clients to talk to
the backend directly.

regards,
abe




view thread (24+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <19340927123446.8209@mail.gol.com>
Permalink:  ../19340927123446.8209@mail.gol.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/19340927123446.8209@mail.gol.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: keke@mac.com
  Subject: Re: Connecting remotely - multi tier
  In-Reply-To: <19340927123446.8209@mail.gol.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox