From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:52:55 -0500
Message-ID: <19483.1047325975@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1047325296.99075.35.camel@jester>
References: <19041.1047322279@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<1047324016.99075.31.camel@jester>
<19294.1047324622@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<1047325296.99075.35.camel@jester>
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> writes:
>> We already have that: you send a startup packet with a version less than
>> the latest, and the backend speaks that version to you.
> Yes, but that requires you know the backend is less than the latest.
As opposed to knowing what? You send the version number you wish to speak;
either the backend can handle it, or not.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, rbt@rbt.ca, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
In-Reply-To: <19483.1047325975@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox