pg.ddx.io pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
Latest postodbc? 3+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* Latest postodbc? @ 1998-03-19 16:30 David Foster <dfoster@panix.com> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: David Foster @ 1998-03-19 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-interfaces; postodbc-users@listserv.direct.net Where is the latest version of PostODBC. Is it posrc31.zip, dated Feb. 12? Over the last week there have been a slew of messages stating that the latest version can be found at ftp.postgresql.org, but I can't find a version of PostODBC there, does anyone have a URL? If found the above file at postodbc.magenet.com, but have no idea if it's the latest version. Thanks PS. Should we now consider the postodbc-users list dead, and stop cross-posting there? ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] Latest postodbc? @ 1998-03-19 17:03 The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> parent: David Foster <dfoster@panix.com> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: The Hermit Hacker @ 1998-03-19 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Foster <dfoster@panix.com>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces; postodbc-users@listserv.direct.net On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, David Foster wrote: > Where is the latest version of PostODBC. Is it posrc31.zip, dated Feb. 12? > > Over the last week there have been a slew of messages stating that the latest > version can be found at ftp.postgresql.org, but I can't find a version of > PostODBC > there, does anyone have a URL? If found the above file at > postodbc.magenet.com, > but have no idea if it's the latest version. The latest version is included with v6.3, and isn't backwards compatible with pre-v6.3 servers (our fault, we changed the internal communications protocols)... Last I heard from Julie, she was hoping to have a couple of nagging bugs worked out of PostODBC sometime this week, *but* if anyone out there can help her out (ie. anyone out there know anything about Windows programming??), I know she'd be much appreciatative about it... > PS. > Should we now consider the postodbc-users list dead, and stop cross-posting > there? Yes... ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] Latest postodbc? @ 1998-03-21 02:57 David Foster <dfoster@panix.com> parent: David Foster <dfoster@panix.com> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: David Foster @ 1998-03-21 02:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-interfaces At 12:03 PM 3/19/98 , The Hermit Hacker wrote: >On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, David Foster wrote: > >> Where is the latest version of PostODBC. Is it posrc31.zip, dated Feb. 12? >> <snip> > The latest version is included with v6.3, and isn't backwards >compatible with pre-v6.3 servers (our fault, we changed the internal >communications protocols)... OK, I grabbed the postgres 6.3 release, as well as the stuff from the CVSup tree. Has anyone been able to compile this? The line breaks seem to have gone screwy, causing lots of the single-line comments to fall over to multiple lines. Not good. First, I thought it was my editor, but I double checked in in a hexdump from a freshly untarred postgres distribution. Is there an easy fix to this, or something I should be doing? ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-03-21 02:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 1998-03-19 16:30 Latest postodbc? David Foster <dfoster@panix.com> 1998-03-19 17:03 ` The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> 1998-03-21 02:57 ` David Foster <dfoster@panix.com>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox