From: Julia A.Case <julie@hub.org>
To: Stephen Davies <scldad@sdc.com.au>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC 16 bit support
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 08:50:01 +0000
Message-ID: <19980419085001.49985@MageNet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199804191234.WAA09636@mustang.sdc.com.au>
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980418150040.302Y-100000@thelab.hub.org>
<199804191234.WAA09636@mustang.sdc.com.au>
Quoting Stephen Davies (scldad@sdc.com.au):
> Not a good example I think. The 16/32-bit ODBC question says nothing about
> dropping features. As I said above, ODBC is ODBC: you either conform or you
> don't. If there happen to be differences between the levels of conformance or
> of performance between 16 and 32-bit models, that would be a pity but not
> earth shattering.
>
But there should be one code tree... With some #ifdef's not 2
seperate code tree's. I think this is the point everyone is making.
Julie
--
[ Julia Anne Case ] [ Ships are safe inside the harbor, ]
[Programmer at large] [ but is that what ships are really for. ]
[ Admining Linux ] [ To thine own self be true. ]
[ Windows/WindowsNT ] [ Fair is where you take your cows to be judged. ]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: julie@hub.org, scldad@sdc.com.au, scrappy@hub.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC 16 bit support
In-Reply-To: <19980419085001.49985@MageNet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox