pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patch
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 21:54:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <199805200154.VAA02090@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35622CED.9B435442@alumni.caltech.edu>

> 
> > > 1. Implement addition of atttypmod field to RowDescriptor messages.
> > >    The client-side code is there but ifdef'd out.  I have no idea
> > >    what to change on the backend side.  The field should be sent
> > >    only if protocol >= 2.0, of course.
> 
> Hmm. I was hoping to do something in the backend to allow data types
> like numeric(p,s) which take multiple qualifying arguments (in this
> case, precision and scale). One possibility was to shoehorn both fields
> into the existing atttypmod 16-bit field.
> 
> Seems like atttypmod is now being used for things outside of the
> backend, but I'm not sure how to support these other uses with these
> other possible data types.

We are just passing it back.  There is no special handling of atttypmod
that you need to worry about.  I think we pass it back to Openlink can
know the actual length of the char() and varchar() fields without doing
a dummy select.  However, they better know it is a char()/varchar()
field before using it for such a purpose, because it could be used from
something else later on, as you suggest.

> A better general approach to the type qualifier problem might be to
> define a variable-length data type which specifies column
> characteristics, and then pass that around. For character strings, it
> would have one field, and for numeric() and decimal() it would have two.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)



view thread (3+ messages)

Message-ID: <199805200154.VAA02090@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../199805200154.VAA02090@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/199805200154.VAA02090@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us, lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patch
  In-Reply-To: <199805200154.VAA02090@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox