From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: dg@illustra.com
Cc: phil@river-bank.demon.co.uk
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 10:16:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <199805221416.KAA28979@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9805220700.AA11579@hawk.illustra.com>
> Database customers at least in the commercial world can be incredibly
> conservative. It is not at all uncommon to have large sites running DBMS
> engines that are three major releases (ie, well over three years) old.
> Once they get an app working, they really don't want anything to change.
Yes, this is true. Their data is locked in Our database. And you can't
just restart it like a PC OS or word processor. Database demands are
much different.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us, dg@illustra.com, phil@river-bank.demon.co.uk, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
In-Reply-To: <199805221416.KAA28979@candle.pha.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox