pg.ddx.io  pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: peter@retep.org.uk
Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 19:10:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <199808062310.TAA19367@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980806184229.793L-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk>

> On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > > On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###.
> > > > 
> > > > I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent
> > > > namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators.
> > > > 
> > > > However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large
> > > > object users.  As I see there are going to be other new large object
> > > > things in 6.4, it may not be an issue.
> > > > 
> > > > Is is OK to rename them internally?
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't be a problem. JDBC does refer to the xin prefix with the
> > > getTables method, so it's simply a single change there.
> > 
> > I am suggesting changes in later releases to older interfaces can
> > communicated with 6.4 without any problems.
> 
> That sounds ok.

Yes.  Older odbc/java/psql interfaces still use the xinv pattern to
restrict table lists.  As new interfaces use relkind, I can then change
the internal name.
-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)



view thread (8+ messages)

Message-ID: <199808062310.TAA19367@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../199808062310.TAA19367@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/199808062310.TAA19367@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
  Cc: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us, peter@retep.org.uk, hackers@postgreSQL.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large objects names
  In-Reply-To: <199808062310.TAA19367@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox