From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Cc: hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 1998 19:35:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <199808092335.TAA21399@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4563.902703709@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > php3 uses PQoidStatus, so I can imagine great problems if we change the
> > libpq interface. I am afraid we are stuck with char*.
>
> Yeah, I can't really see breaking applications just for a marginal
> improvement in cleanliness.
>
> There is a possible compromise however: we could leave PQcmdTuples and
> PQoidStatus defined as-is (but do something to get rid of PQoidStatus'
> use of a static return area), and add two more functions that have more
> reasonable return conventions. The documentation could describe the
> older functions as deprecated.
>
> Perhaps the int-returning forms could be named "PQCmdTuples" and
> "PQOidStatus" (note difference in capitalization) ... unless someone
> has a better idea.
>
> Does anyone think this is worth the trouble, or shall we leave bad
> enough alone?
Perhaps we can leave the change for a time when we want to change the
libpq interface in a more significant way. Having two functions just
seems like a waste for such a rarely-called fuction.
>
> I do intend to get rid of the static return area for PQoidStatus in any
> case. I'd also like to fix the problem with PQconninfoOptions not being
> treated as a constant (specifically, the "val" fields are being used as
> working storage). Is anyone aware of any applications that would be
> broken by removing "val" from the PQconninfoOption struct?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] thread-safe libpq and DBD::Pg
In-Reply-To: <199808092335.TAA21399@candle.pha.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox